A simple, strongly typed and boilerplate poor implementation of the Result pattern.
Results.Crank aims to be a modern implementation of the results pattern, making use of new language features the got introduced in the recent years for C#, like Records and Pattern Matching. It's supposed to allow writing typed error handling code without having to write lots of boilerplate and focus on what's important: You're code.
If a method can fail by design, it should indicate so. The extent of how far you go with this is your decision. Personally I try to differentiate between errors that can happen by design, and errors that are unexpected.
- A
GetByIdmethod can fail by design, as the id can simply not exist. In this case, indicate so and use theIResult/IResult<TValue>types this library provides - A
GetAllmethod can not fail by design (in most cases at least). It could fail if there is network error, but this would be an unexpected error which should still be thrown. In this case your method should return the result directly, without encapsulating it in aIResult<TValue>.
A few good and more indepth reads on this topic:
- Error handling: Exception or Result? by Enterprise Craftsmanship
- Exceptions for flow control in C# by Enterprise Craftsmanship
- Operation result by ForEvolve
An IReason can either be an Error or a Success and is nothing more than a typed 1object encapsulating some error/success information.
An IResult on the other hand indicates if a method has Passed or Failed during its execution.
In that sense (and also implementation wise), each IResult is also a IReason.
The same way, each Passed is also a Success and Failed is also an Error.
An IResult can either be valueless, or it can contain a value, in which case IResult<TValue> should be used.
IResult should never be derived, whereas IReason can (and often should) be derived to provide typed error or success objects.
Do not derive IReason directly though, but derive from either Error or Success.
All implementations of IReason and IResult are records and fully immutable.
Modify them using the extension methods provided in ResultExtensions.
To create new IResult use the factory methods in the static class Result.
Extension methods and factory methods are fully alligned, allowing you to fluently type together result objects.
For the technically interested, this is done using a source generator, converting the extension methods to normal static methods which forward to the extension methods.
When there are designed for scenarios the make your fail, it should indicate so.
You can do this by return IResult for methods without a return value, or IResult<TValue> for methods with a return value.
public IResult Method()
{
if (successful)
{
return Result.Pass();
}
else
{
return Result.Fail();
}
}
public IResult<string> Method()
{
if (successful)
{
return Result.Pass("success value);
}
else
{
return Result.Fail<string>();
}
}It can be useful to provide a quick message with your result, e.g. for logging purposes, to indicate what happend
public IResult Method()
{
if (successful)
{
return Result.Pass()
.WithMessage("all good");
}
else
{
return Result.Fail()
.WithMessage("oh no!");
}
}You can add Error and Success objects as causes for your result, to better understand what happend.
public IResult Method()
{
if (successful)
{
return Result.Pass()
.WithSuccess(new Success("I did everything right"));
}
else
{
return Result.Fail()
.WithError(new Error("I mad a boo"));
}
}Since all IResults are IReasons you can also add another methods result as the reasons for your result.
public IResult Method()
{
if (Validate is Failed failed)
{
return Result.WithError(failed)
.WithMessage("Validation failed");
}
return Result.Passed();
}
private IResult Validate()
{
// validate and return result indicating validation success
}In most cases, passing or failing in a method depends on different operations, and is not clear from the beginning. You can use a handful of useful methods to build up your results.
public IResult<int> Method(int a, int b)
{
return Result.WithErrorIf(a < b, new Error("a is smaller than b"))
.WithErrorIf(a > b, "b is smaller than a") // strings get casted to Error/Success records if appropriate
.WithSuccessIf(a == b, new Success("a and b are equal"))
.WithValue(a * b); // value only gets added if Passed. In Failed scenarios it gets dropped.
}When you have a method that returns an IResult, you can take different actions depending on the result.
It is recommended to use pattern matching for this case, of course you can also use a more classical approach.
public IResult Method(int a, int b)
{
var result = MethodThatReturnsResultOfInt();
switch (result)
{
case Passed<int> { Value: var value}:
_logger.LogInfo($"The method returned {value}");
break;
case Failed { Message: var message }:
_logger.LogWarning($"Something went wrong: {message}");
break;
}
}It is possible (and recommended) to use your own typed Error and Success objects.
Although it is possible to use the Cranks.Result with just the default Error and Success objects, you get much more out of it when using them.
Errors are simple records and can be defined with a single line of code! This makes them easy to define without cluttering your application in lots of boilerplate code.
public record MySimpleError : Error;
public record MyErrorWithDataFields(int value) : Error;
public record MyErrorWithCustomMessage(int value) : Error($"This value is invalid: {value}");You can use your customized errors everywhere you would otherwise use an error:
public IResult Method()
{
return Result.WithError<MySimpleError>()
.WithError(new MyErrorWithDataFields(42))
.WithErrorIf(condition, new MyErrorWithCustomMessage(1337));
}- Analyzer which throws an error when trying to derive from IResult outside of the library
- Improved Usage: Try, TryOrError Others?
- Idea to improve source generation to provide Result.FactoryMethods. But it has downsides... Analyze more.
- ASP.NET Core wrapper. Provide base error types and mapping rules for IActionResult so that results can be simply returned
- Stringifier to modify how errors get converted to strings?
React
Typescript
Django
Laravel
Facebook
Microsoft
Google
Alibaba
D3
Tencent