On-Floor Status Vote about constitution HOT 3 CLOSED

Nth year here, we have done this for as long as I can remember. Since there is absolutely no reason for not wanting to be an on-floor member, I would suggest just toss it up to Evals discretion.

from constitution.

Unless the prospective member states one way or another, it's up to the Evals Director whether or not they want to hold the vote for on-floor or not. The constitution states that a member can request to be brought up for on-floor status at any time. When I was Evals, I operated under the assumption that if a person becomes an intro member, then they would likely want on-floor status anyway (I was also following precedent).

It is perfectly within the right of the Evals Director to ask the prospective member if they want to be brought up at all for on-floor status. If the prospective member's desire is unknown, it is also within Evals's right to ask the room at the time of the vote if they want to consider on floor status. If the general consensus is no, then the vote doesn't have to happen.

Generally the best course of action would be to either hold the vote automatically as we currently do (unless the prospective member states otherwise), or to ask the prospective member if they want to be brought up.

from constitution.

I don't think this needs to be explicitly forbidden. Right now the way that it is worded allows for us to operate in the way we've done since @eatnumber1 was a freshman. I don't see a compelling reason to change this.

from constitution.