Bundle with company-mode? about company-inf-ruby HOT 3 CLOSED

Mostly because inf-ruby isn't, is isn't likely to ever be, in GNU ELPA, and each user has to deal with third-party packages anyway. This way they can install company-inf-ruby, and inf-ruby will be installed along, if absent. More backends available through ELPA separately also means better visibility for Company.

Has that been a problem for someone?

from company-inf-ruby.

Nope, I was just wondering about this as I noticed many backends depending on third-party plugins were bundled, but not this one. I like consistency and I feel that either all such backends should be moved into separate packages (which will be better for visibility and would make maintaining the core package a bit easier) or everything "official" should be bundled by default.

Personally I prefer the more modular approach, but that's obviously subjective.

from company-inf-ruby.

ll such backends should be moved into separate packages

I guess that would be good, but I'll have to ask if it's okay to have several tiny company- packages. Unlike the other repositories, GNU ELPA is rather small.

from company-inf-ruby.