Recommended fields & levels of metadata, from Neil's wssspe piece about codemeta HOT 5 CLOSED

Nice article. But the downloaded document not contain a date or suggested citation. This hinders understanding the context in which it was written and sharing it with others.

from codemeta.

@band - I'm the original author of this document, which was a working document for a workshop.

At present I'm in the process of addressing reviewer comments on an extended version of the document submitted to the Journal of Open Research Software. If accepted, this would have both a published date and suggested citation.

from codemeta.

@npch Thanks for the note and publication outlook. I have some thoughts about the paper and deriving metrics based on your work. (Re-)usable data sets share many of the same or similar properties.

from codemeta.

@band would love to hear your thoughts on the subject!
On Thu, 28 May 2015 at 19:43 Willliam L. Anderson [email protected]
wrote:

@npch https://github.com/npch Thanks for the note and publication
outlook. I have some thoughts about the paper and deriving metrics based on
your work. (Re-)usable data sets share many of the same or similar
properties.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#16 (comment).

from codemeta.

Are there any particular outcomes from this ticket in terms of changes to the crosswalk table? If not, we can probably close it, noting that we should cite the paper by @npch in our crosswalk piece, if it has come out yet. A pointer to that would be useful, @npch...

from codemeta.