http://www.rescue.org/press-releases/syria’s-women-and-girls-continue-face-chaos-and-danger-fearing-their-safety-18565

The

’

is missed by the regex. the fix is to add \u2019 changing

/(^|[\n\s>])((?:https?|ftp):\/\/[\-A-Z0-9+\u0026@#\/%?=()~_|!:,.;]*[\-A-Z0-9+\u0026@#\/%=~()_|])/gi

to

/(^|[\n\s>])((?:https?|ftp):\/\/[\-A-Z0-9+\u0026\u2019@#\/%?=()~_|!:,.;]*[\-A-Z0-9+\u0026@#\/%=~()_|])/gi

Actually I am not sure for a reason why links are absent, but

http://google.com
"http://google.com"
(http://google.com)

(all in single string) produces no links for me. Tested in Chrome 45.0.2454.85 m.

This will allow it to be used from within node.js/io.js and with browserify.

if i have css type =" background:url(http://XXX.jpg)" in html, then the background will dispear when load autolink.js :( ;

Parsing out URLs is a very old problem and there are quite a few solid solutions to it.

• the regexps component has a comprehensive, yet one-line URL regexp that handles modern TLDs
• jQuery contributor Ben Aldman has written javascript-linkify
• jQuery linkify has seem some serious effort put into it
• Django has a urlize library that has been ported to JavaScript (it doesn't support TLDs properly)
  How does autolink differentiate? By not autolinking "google.com"? I wouldn't complain if the repo didn't have 87 stars :)

Tested it with this string and it doesn't add links:

var s = '

http://nba.com

Basically, links wrapped in paragraph tags.

Could you please tag the repo (eg. "v0.0.1") so that I can use autolink-js with bower?

I'd like to provide something like:

[
{
keyword: 'foo',
url: 'http://example.com'
}
]

or just simply html = autolink({keyword: 'foo', link: 'https://...'}) and your lib would find keywords and replace with a tags.

Email support

Add email support when autolinking strings. (mailto)

Example

Input:

Go to http://www.rubyonrails.org and say hello to [email protected]

Output:

Go to <a href=\"http://www.rubyonrails.org\">http://www.rubyonrails.org</a> and say hello to <a href=\"mailto:[email protected]\">[email protected]</a>

Hello all, user on my website have found out that when he types " ..aiming" string in comment and save it, it is shown as link "http://..aiming", because I wrap comments with autolink when show them. So, I think, it's incorrect behaviour, because " ..aiming" is not a link. I checked the code of autolink.js and found out that " ..aiming" string matches your url regexp, so autolink wrap it as link. Please check this and fix, please.

What about url's without protocol, but where a user has entered dub dub dub? I'd say something like www.google.com should be autolinked if found in a string ... Am I missing something? :)

Right now the regex is looking for the beginning of a string or whitespaces before a match. This means that stuff like this <p>http://www.example.com/</p> won't be matched.

Changing the expression to
/(^|\s|>)(\b(https?):\/\/[\-A-Z0-9+&@#\/%?=~_|!:,.;]*[\-A-Z0-9+&@#\/%=~_|]\b)/ig
solves this specific case, but still doesn't fix things like "http://www.example.com".

I can't think of a good fix tha won't break the tests for images and anchors with the lack of lookbehinds in JS and my limited regex-fu.

Thoughts?

Edit: I just realized this will break the test for not affecting existing anchors. I'm back to the drawing board, then...

Hey guys, I'm not too good at these regex's but if I can figure it out I'll make a PR. If anyone can help let me know I'd like to allow the regex to also support a string that's domain only. Something like myawesomesite.com ...basically regardless if http or www is present any string that has .com will be autolinked.

I made local changes the start of the regex

 (^|\s)

to

(^|[\n\s>])

and that is catching the missing edge cases. How it reads: from the start of the string or after any \n (newline) \s (space) or >

Hi. I added regex pattern to include Hebrew characters.
You can add this range to all patterns:
\u0590-\u05FF

Preview URL:

http://www.hrus.co.il/הכנס-השנתי-לניהול-משאבי-אנוש/הכנס-השנתי-לניהול-משאבי-אנוש-2016?gclid=CPPdptDyx8sCFe4y0wodWlMH9g

I like that your library is short, sweet, and does just one thing. I have a project I am considering using this on, but depending on what license you choose I may have to keep looking or roll my own. No pressure though, do whatever is best for you & the project.