betahex / cdncomparison Goto Github PK

Working ticket to indicate if a provider uses DNSSEC for their records.

Would be great to add Akamai if possible. Assuming one can decode their pricing structure and if they offer a simple one to begin with.

I love what you have done here. Seems like one of the few "comparison" sites that are easy to follow in chart form while fairly comprehensive.

Please consider adding the following CDN providers:
https://cdnsun.com/
https://www.cdn77.com

I see you have closed a few other requests out stating pull request required. Is it your requirement that the requester research the answers and submit a pull request on cdncomparison/index.html with the requested changes?

Thank you so much for your time...

I'm not sure why it's listed with a yellow ?, but it seems misleading. CoudFront relies on you using versioned URLs, you can't purge the cache quickly at all.

They offer Push Zone at an extra cost, you can upload files to their storage cluster, but files are not distributed to edge servers until be requested (pull).

Although your content has been uploaded to the storage cluster, data is only deployed to an edge server location if it has been requested.

https://www.keycdn.com/support/upload-data-to-a-push-zone/

seems that pricing row is a little outdated?

Hi Ethan @betahex ,

I'm quite surprised to discover that you have removed CDN77 from your website cdncomparison.com
May I ask for the reasons why you've made this?

I'd like to know the reasons so that we can improve/change anything... Is there something we can do to undo this?

You can reach out to me also at [email protected].

Thanks for your time and reply.

Oskar

@betahex was wondering if you guys can add SwiftServe CDN into your cdncomparison list? Any requirements needed to be met?

I'm not sure this is an industry-wide term, but Flexible SSL, as defined by CloudFlare, refers to the situation where: "there is an encrypted connection between your site visitors and CloudFlare, but not from CloudFlare to your server." (That is, the connection between the CDN and the user is encrypted, but the connection between the CDN and the origin is not.)

I don't see Cloudflare listed unless their CDN goes by another name, by all indications on their site they developed their own CDN.

Lots of issues and pull requests are piling up; maybe delegate if you can't process them?

It would be nice to list which CDNs offer extra support for adding CORS headers for certain resources.

E.g.

• KeyCDN CORS
• MaxCDN CORS Headers

Seems to be a massive player missing from your listing

Would like to see the comparison, including CloudFlare. Thanks.

Hello there,

I am Dmitriy from SkyparkCDN.
I would like to add SkyparkCDN to http://cdncomparison.com/ and firstly I need to clarify some points:

1. Concerning RTMP Streaming features, we do not support RTMP. Can we replace it to or add a Video on Demand (VOD) over HLS?
2. What do I need to put in Real-time statistics point if we have statistics with a delay of 1 hour?
3. What do custom rules mean?
4. Can we add our own points for comparing? If yes, how will other ISP providers add information about themselves on these points?

Thank you.

Best regards,
Dmitriy Novoselov

i made a fork to add dropigee another CDN provider I work at.

Find them here:
https://www.leaseweb.com/cdn

Hi,
The comparison has a question mark for IPV6 with keyCDN.

When i do nslookup on one of my zones on KeyCDN I get an IPV6 address.

e.g. nslookup video-56b4.kxcdn.com , example file: https://video-56b4.kxcdn.com/out.mp4

Hi, could we please add CDNetworks to the list of CDN vendors?

Thanks so much!
Sharon Bell
[email protected]
www.cdnetworks.com

Working ticket to gather data indicate if a providers POPs are accessible over IPv6. This includes the providers DNS resolves also being available over IPv6.

For example, querying edge123.example.myprovider.net should return AAAA records for the nameserver and AAAA records for the host too.

Custom SSL is listed as extra cost for Cloudfront, but it is only the "Dedicated IP Custom SSL" feature that costs extra. "SNI Custom SSL" does not.

Source: https://aws.amazon.com/cloudfront/custom-ssl-domains/

We should have some sort of standard definitions for some/most/all of the rows in the table, without which it is hard to add anyone.

Hi,

I'm Kenji Baheux working on the web platform in the Chrome team.

Brotli is a new compression algorithm, which is now available in Chrome and Firefox as a content-encoding option for HTTPS. It offers significant compression wins over gzip (e.g. 25% better compression being typical).

Sam Saffron (at Discourse), in his Brotli overview article, suggested that it would be quite useful to have information about Brotli support on cdncomparison.com

It's currently supported by the following CDNs:

• KeyCDN
• CDN77 ("appears to be letting Brotli through")

Also, we are aware of a few on-going efforts for other CDNs.
For reference, here are some deployment examples we are aware of: Facebook, Google Fonts.

Would it be possible to add information about Brotli to cdncomparison.com?
Best,

FYI

You have:

Increased reliability - handle traffic spickes and reduce system overload.

It should be:

Increased reliability - handle traffic spikes and reduce system overload.

MaxCDN is still offered as a stand alone service, but was acquired Stackpath. Maybe use the later here?

By the way: currently preparing a blog post on the topic, this is here safes a lot of time!

Can cache invalidation be addressed for these CDNs? Akamai, for example can be pretty slow ( like 10 minutes or more ), while others like Fast.ly are trying to be very fast.

Please add G-core CDN to the comparison list.
Detailed information about service and logo in attachment.
Website: https://gcdn.co
G-CDN - company profile.xlsx
G-CDN - company profile.pdf

looks like CDN77 has a minimum startup fee of $149 after 14-day free trial. These credits expire after one year unless you "recharge" your account with another minimum of $150 which then extends your funds another year...how lame, they looked pretty great. "confirmed this with support"

Hi,

thanks for the page, it's very informative.

I think it would be interesting to evaluate CDNs for the mentioned features.

Purge-by-tag is if you can purge assets by a tag, which the origin server has sent along, e.g. with the "Cache-Tag" header.

Not all CDNs support wildcards in their purge-by-url feature.

Purge-by-tag: KeyCDN, (Cloudflare)
Wildcard-support: Azure, Fastly

Thanks

As of I know, it only supports Origin Pull

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonCloudFront/latest/DeveloperGuide/AddingObjects.html

They report that the data is automatically distributed across their network, like a CDN, while retaining more in-depth storage.

Is it close enough to be considered as a CDN?

Please add Google CloudCDN to the comparison