berry-pool / nft-plutus Goto Github PK

Hey,
I am trying to get this sample project to work, but I am experiencing some type errors in the offchain code. Maybe related to some lucid library changes.

Data.from expects a string but gets a bigInt:
const Count = (c: number): Datum => Data.from(BigInt(c));

Same here Data.from expects a string but gets Construct instance. Should be Data.to imo

const Action = {
  Mint: Data.from(new Construct(0, [])) as Redeemer,
  Burn: Data.from(new Construct(1, [])) as Redeemer,
};

I have also tried to bypass the offchain part by using the Cardano cli directly, but no success yet. Minting the thread tokens works, but minting the tokens with the coin policy does not yet.
Could someone maybe translate the transaction build in the offchain part to the cardano-cli commands?

Hello Alessandro 👋

Massive fan of your work!
I've been thinking about this for a bit now, and your project gave me a few ideas that I've been tinkering around on my own.

So it would be some kind of NFT proposal (a bit like a CIP ?)
An open-source standard for a Plutus "wrapper" contract that would enable some standardisation around NFT specific functionalities.

• Ability to list an NFT in multiple marketplaces (IE decentralise the NFT listing process)
• Ability for NFT to be displayed in your wallet while being listed
• Ability for NFT to still being eligible for airdrops / access control
• Standardisation and enforcement of royalties
• Standardisation of bids

And also more advanced things like :

• fractionalisation (inspired by fracada)
• shared ownership of an NFT etc

The goal would be to push the ecosystem forward so it remains competitive with the other chains (right now it's too complicated to use Plutus as you mentioned in your tweet, so from a user POV it feels like Cardano NFTs are more limited than EVMs) and also to create some kind of framework for people to contribute to enable future things (I'm not sure this fits CIPs, so maybe we could create CNIPs or CNPs ?)

Would you be interested in having a look/discussing the proposal before I make it public ?