32-Inventory-Report.size
side - 16/16
speed - 393/404

32-Inventory-Report.speed
side - 16/16
speed - 393/377

« 74/76 by @ekx »

This actually leads to a 71 steps solution. :3

This repo started off with standard solutions I came up with for all levels, without necessarily meeting or exceeding the size and speed challenges. I set it as a goal to make this into a collaborative space to push the boundaries of size/speed optimizations, and it has been going really well so far :) But, I'm also a little bothered by the fact that there's no longer any room for any "normal" solutions that could help people with learning about algorithms and get unstuck in the game.

I can think of 2 options:

Option A:
Continue with hosting just size/speed optimizations.

Option B:
Find a naming convention / folder structure to also host several "normal" solutions (like both a bubble sort and a selection sort alternative to 41 Sorting Floor)

Any suggestions?

@nanashi-juanto I'm rebasing and merging this branch in to prevent further divergence from master. Let me know if you had any additional commits that weren't yet pushed -- we can still rebase and get those in later.

I was wondering: is there any desire for the addition of fun/strange/interesting/unusual solutions to puzzles, even if they aren't a record for either size or speed? (I ask, since my solution to Duplicate Removal uses a hash-table based algorithm that is quite different from the solutions already listed. I think it might be of interest to others even though it's not as good!)

Here is a 11 commands & 53 steps for lvl 24 by myself (@drallieiv)

-- HUMAN RESOURCE MACHINE PROGRAM --

a:
    INBOX   
    COPYTO   0
    INBOX   
    COPYTO   1
    COPYFROM 0
b:
    SUB      1
    JUMPN    c
    JUMP     b
c:
    ADD      1
    OUTBOX  
    JUMP     a


DEFINE LABEL 0
eJzjYWBgmKDjfr7Y/OSiV1ZaPQl2W1IjHFOjzrvMDvZ1rcoUdj53GaiE4ZM5y/yVQe4LGUbBKBgFwwoA
AHzKEfk;

DEFINE LABEL 1
eJyTY2BgOKEvGwqkGI4aJGie0psf5qM3v4XdwHtJs+H8TSDxNoMUnUW2j7SEnVN0Wj1yjf55fTb75tvk
uMWPw+2zX4jfFr+IwD3e88MMLV7HLbXZkirmxFJ40m16HZuHYhtQfd8Rj70z2TwY5kQ4nlxUZ8y71FM/
YDnDKBgFo2BQAADScywL;

DEFINE LABEL 3
eJwTZGBgWGvp7vre4nHbG8tLK4BchhXWsqGSjtf8rzhJBvW7PIo46VaX0+XWXxHgIloLFK9dYd1VmmE9
uTrB7nWPh/u5pQyjYBSMgiELAByyG2I;

The simulator is incorrectly showing sort solutions as failing, because it is sorting 10 before 2:

input:
[ 7, 10, 6, 6, 5, 7, 6, 2, 4, 0, 'M', 'K', 'R', 'W', 0, 3, 2, 5, 5, 10, 3, 6, 5, 7, 8, 0 ]
expected:
[ 10, 2, 4, 5, 6, 6, 6, 7, 7, 'K', 'M', 'R', 'W', 10, 2, 3, 3, 5, 5, 5, 6, 7, 8 ]
actual:
[ 2, 4, 5, 6, 6, 6, 7, 7, 10, 'K', 'M', 'R', 'W', 2, 3, 3, 5, 5, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10 ]

One solution is to remove 10 from the test pool. Another is to fix the problem.

Could have better looks than the README.md, and could allow dynamic features like pulling in level info from hrm-level-data, and even the ability run programs right inside the browser.

Prior to the naming convention of including the author in the filename, we had been accepting PRs that simply overwrote existing solutions. It could be very tedious task, but it would be nice to recover old solutions (especially the "normal" ones).

(Wasn't sure how to submit but this gets the speed completed)

-- HUMAN RESOURCE MACHINE PROGRAM --

a:
b:
    INBOX   
    JUMPN    c
    JUMP     e

c:
    COPYTO   0

d:
    OUTBOX  
    BUMPUP   0
    JUMPN    d
    JUMPZ    g

e:
    COPYTO   5

f:
    OUTBOX  
    BUMPDN   5
    JUMPN    b
    JUMP     f

g:
    OUTBOX  
    JUMP     a

Utilizes either hrm-cpu or hrmsandbox to run a program against a level.

Could use an inline pie or bar that shows % and perhaps also uses a colour gradient.

• Comments
• Labels

As proposed in #69, the files that have now been split up into folders need to be renamed by someone or a robot.

Due to https://github.com/shinnn/gulp-gh-pages/issues/116

I have an 84 step solution to 20-Multiplication Workshop. I'd like to submit it, but when I try to create a PR using GitHub desktop, I get:

Sync failed to push local changes
It seems you do not have permission to push your changes to this repository.

I'm new to github, and I'm probably doing something incorrectly. I've cloned the repo, created a branch, and commited my local changes to the branch. Should I be able to create a PR at this step?

http://goofans.com/forum/more-2d-boys/human-resource-machine/14076
Some of them beat the solution in this repo.

To shorten the name and also to align with the naming convention of the sister repos:

• https://github.com/nrkn/hrm-cpu
• https://github.com/atesgoral/hrm-level-data

http://steamcommunity.com/app/375820/discussions/0/483367798503744243/

The solution 28.247-jdashton.asm fails on numbers with two or more prime factors greater than 5. The remaining solutions (not listed as 'specific') do not fail with these values. Perhaps inbox generator could include some of these as 'special cases' to test? (e.g. 25, 49, 91, and 115)

I am new to github and am very confused. I'm still trying to figure out how to do everything.

This does it in 11 commands and 53 steps.

-- HUMAN RESOURCE MACHINE PROGRAM --

a:
INBOX
COPYTO 0
INBOX
COPYTO 1
COPYFROM 0
b:
SUB 1
JUMPN c
JUMP b
c:
ADD 1
OUTBOX
JUMP a

hrm-level-data only has samples, not test data

Solutions for mission 20 based on binarylut all assume that inputs are 0-9, so should be marked input-specific.

To reduce clutter, to bring README content into the fold, and to easily ensure Gulp tasks just iterate over actual solution files.

-- HUMAN RESOURCE MACHINE PROGRAM --

a:
INBOX
JUMPZ d
b:
COPYTO 0
INBOX
JUMPZ c
ADD 0
JUMP b
c:
COPYFROM 0
d:
OUTBOX
JUMP a

« 11/12 by @pyaehtetaung »

The URL is good, but the file is still named with "size.speed" instead of "size" only :
https://github.com/atesgoral/human-resource-machine-solutions/blob/master/25-Cumulative-Countdown.size.speed.asm

See nrkn/hrm-cpu#28

Hi - I'm really not sure that an issue is the best way to communicate this, but just wanted to say that if you want to programatically check the solutions, I made a runtime that executes HRM asm files in javascript:

https://github.com/nrkn/hrm-cpu

See the test folder to see how you would batch check multiple solutions - I'm currently testing against my own (admittedly feeble) solutions

Requires node >=4.12

• Check for dereferencing

A registry would be nice, either via a JSON file (maintained per PR) or an index.js which could return the solutions for some level n. This would let me wire up hrm-level-data, hrm-level-inbox-generator, hrm-level-outbox-generator, and hrm-solutions as a set to feed my sandbox (or any other emulator, really).

Pseudocode:

var levels = require('hrm-level-data');
var inboxer = require('hrm-level-inbox-generator');
var outboxer = require('hrm-level-outbox-generator');
var solutions = require('hrm-solutions');

levels.forEach(function (level) {
  var inbox = inboxer.generate(level.number);
  var outbox = outboxer.generate(level.number, inbox);
  if (inbox === null || outbox === null) {
    inbox = level.examples[0].inbox.splice();
    outbox = level.examples[0].outbox.splice();
  }

  // the Solution Registry tie-in here
  solutions.getSolutions(level.number, function (solution) {
     // execute `solution`
     var results = hrm.execute(solution, { inbox: inbox, variables: level.floor.tiles.splice() });
     if (!testOutboxes(results.outbox, outbox)) {
        // bad
     }
  });
});