alicekaerast / ioffice Goto Github PK

A room name isn't necesarily unique, so attempting to reserve a room name that returns multiple results will book the first room matching the name

We can assume that room names are unique within a building, so we need to handle the concept of a building

Currently when we make a booking we take a location name and perform a full-text search using that name in order to get an location ID. This is a problem because partial matches are possible, leading to the wrong location ID being selected and therefore some locations being impossible to book.

Eg. if a building has locations named 123, 1123 and 2123 then specifying the location named 123 first cause a search to be performed which will return all three locations. We then take the first location found (which I think is the first one created), and then attempt to book that location. Since the location 2123 is consistently being returned as the first result it is impossible to book the location named 123.

We should be able to take either a location name or a location ID, and/or do a better job of returning the expected location when searching

We should show an extra column for office name in the list of reservations

Currently you have to either remember which office you're booked into, or guess from the location naming scheme

We could possibly remove the "Checked In?" column if this starts making the table too wide because that's no longer needed by most users of this app

Some of the other commands may also benefit from updates to make it easier to work across multiple buildings too

This is apparently a relatively new feature, we need to investigate how it works

GoReleaser is failing with:

   ⨯ release failed after 0s                  error=failed to get module path: exit status 2: flag provided but not defined: -m
usage: list [-e] [-race] [-f format] [-json] [-tags 'tag list'] [packages]

This looks like it might be attempting to run go list, however I can't reproduce the error message locally

I don't know how many people are actually using releases vs. compiling from source, so I don't know how urgent this is. But there isn't much development going on given the featureset is good enough for most people now.