aleksaan / diskusage Goto Github PK

using "diskusage.exe" i get size ~44 GB
using "network share" from another PC I get ~20 GB
If I get properties directly on respective server I get ~15 GB

Could you please explain me , how exactly size is being calculated by diskusage.exe and why is that different from other two

It would be nice to control order by some field. I can see it defaults to size decreasingly, but I would want by name, as seen in my explorer window.

Also, if it isn't yet a feature, would -limit 0 be limitless?

Target: Get CSV file for most comfortly working with results

To do:

1. add option -csv
2. if -csv isn't set clearly that no scv file will be generated
3. if -csv option is not contains filename this one will be generated as <res_yyyy.MM.dd_hh:mm:ss.csv>

Hi,

I'm using diskusage.exe for more than one year to monitor most consumming directories. It is very simple and handy tool.
However while scanning of one my disk (with logs) containing:
Overall info:
Total time: 4h35m55.7915268s
Total dirs: 499520
Total files: 8887953
Total links: 0
Total size: 10.45 Tb
diskusage.exe (on Windows 64bit) consumes more than 3GB of RAM. It tooks also more than 4 hours.

Is there some way how to optimize at least - memory consumption or also the time needed?

Jurajazz

All we need is log

i set fixunit ,but it not work, this is my options:

analyzer:
  path: D:\test
  depth: 1
printer:
  limit: 0
  fixunit: Mb
  sort:  name_asc
  tofile: diskusage_out.txt

`duck_f.exe -depth=3 -size=c -top=12 -filter=d -hr < .\results_a.txt
Input data is in not compatible format: invalid character 'ÿ' looking for beginning of value

Arguments:
filter: d
depth: 3
top: 12
hr: true
size: c

Results:`

Maybe some charset conversion is needed? How could I replace all invalid characters in my result.txt with a cmd command? which charset was chosen?

Sergey Glaznitsa: Do not render excess results.
Example of current results (limit=2):
C:\a - 100Mb
C:\a\b - 99Mb
(C:\x - 30Mb - do not output because is less than a & b folders.)

Output has two rows with the same folder. However folder c:\a contains (without C:\a\b) only 1Mb of its 100Mb volume. Only 1% of volume. And folder C:\a\b contains 99% of volume.
It is not nessesary to output c:\a volume in this case.
Results should be like that:
C:\a\b - 99Mb
C:\x - 30Mb
(C:\a - 100Mb - do not output because its "clean" size (without C:\a\b) only 1Mb and other 99Mb has been printed yet above for c:\a\b folder)

Second example:
C:\a - 100Mb (clean size is 51Mb)
C:\a\b - 49Mb
(C:\x - 30Mb - do not output because is less than a (clean size) & b size)

C:\a "clean" volume (without C:\a\b) is 51Mb and that is reason to include c:\a to results.

Just discovered this from StackOverflow and I'm impressed with the speed of this versus using dir or Get-ChildItem.

However, for my use case, I simply want to print out all the files and folders in a nice table with sizes in human-friendly values (kB, MB, GB, etc.).

The -hr switch works great, but it cuts off the results after a certain number of rows and only shows the last row after that. Looking at the code, it's after 48 rows.

Is there a planned feature to allow for all rows to be shown in -hr mode? It's bit a of a shame that the options are so few for what seems like a great tool :)

Side note: sometimes the first few letters are omitted from folders, like ode_modules instead of \node_modules. Am I doing something wrong?

This tool works great to index the largest folders. Are you planning to add a function to do the same for files, so it is possible to find the largest files on a drive in the same format?

Will you create graphical user interface ?