So is this code actually working? about mnist-svhn-transfer HOT 9 OPEN

@mario98
Hey, were you able to get this code working?

from mnist-svhn-transfer.

https://github.com/YeolJ00/mnist-svhn-transfer
I've edited the code to work and changed some functions to meet recent updates
I wanted to make a branch or a pull request in this repository but wasn't able to figure out how.

from mnist-svhn-transfer.

@YeolJ00 Hi there, would you please point out the problem in this code and the change you made?

from mnist-svhn-transfer.

@EvaFlower Putting aside the deprecated functions,
data_loader.py had a single tranform format in get_loader() that normalizes a 3 channel image.
MNIST data is not a 3 channel image thus requires a seperate transform format
It would be nice if you would double check it for me

from mnist-svhn-transfer.

@YeolJ00 Yeah, you are right. But it did not raise exceptional information when running the code. So maybe it has no influence.

from mnist-svhn-transfer.

@EvaFlower What do you mean by exceptional information? In what sense do you mean by it has no influence?

from mnist-svhn-transfer.

@YeolJ00 I mean that I can run the code successfully without changing the transform for MNIST. So maybe here it just used the transform in the first channel and ignored others.

from mnist-svhn-transfer.

@EvaFlower Well good for you. I wasn't able to run the code without changing that part. I wonder what the difference was.

from mnist-svhn-transfer.

I get a reasonable result, when set "--use_reconst_loss True" and "--use_labels True"。 the MINST's generator result is better than svhn's

from mnist-svhn-transfer.