Option to ignore repetition separator in the ST/SE segments about staedi HOT 8 CLOSED

Hi @saravanan-periyasamy03 , do you mean that the composite separator is used in the data and it should not be interpreted as such? Since the ISA version is 00400, the repetition feature of X12 isn't actually enabled for the interchange.

For the PRF segment, the intent is that MILLWORK:LIT08-04-23 is the entire PRF01 element?

from staedi.

Hi @MikeEdgar ,

Yes. MILLWORK:LIT08-04-23 is the entire data of PFR01 and we don't want EDIStreamReader to interpret it and throw exception.

Since the ISA version is 00400, the repetition feature of X12 isn't actually enabled for the interchange. Are you saying for ISA version 00400 , the repetition will not take any effect?

from staedi.

@saravanan-periyasamy03 , yes repetition will not take effect, but the composite element will be used, which is what you're seeing with :. Even then, it shouldn't throw an exception, but rather emit an error event (that you can ignore in this case).

Can you share a small file that reproduces the exception?

from staedi.

Hi @MikeEdgar ,

Here is the sample EDI,

ISA*00* *00* *02*ABCB *01*123456789 *230816*1432*U*00400*111283228*0*P*:~ GS*MM*ABCB*123456789*20230816*1432*283230*X*004010~ ST*866*111300152~ LX*1~ AT8*G*L*830*16~ PRF*230222069~ PRF*WORK:MIT08-04-23~ SE*6*111300152~ GE*1*283230~ IEA*1*111283228~

Note: We are not having the composite element defined in the schema.

from staedi.

@saravanan-periyasamy03 , I'm not able to reproduce the exception with the test case below. Besides the schema, is there anything else I could be missing? Does this test case produce the exception for you?

@Test
void testIssue383() throws IOException {
    EDIInputFactory factory = EDIInputFactory.newFactory();
    InputStream source = new ByteArrayInputStream((""
            + "ISA*00*          *00*          *02*ABCB           *01*123456789      *230816*1432*U*00400*111283228*0*P*:~ "
            + "GS*MM*ABCB*123456789*20230816*1432*283230*X*004010~ "
            + "ST*866*111300152~ "
            + "LX*1~ "
            + "AT8*G*L*830*16~ "
            + "PRF*230222069~ "
            + "PRF*WORK:MIT08-04-23~ "
            + "SE*6*111300152~ "
            + "GE*1*283230~ "
            + "IEA*1*111283228~").getBytes());
    EDIStreamReader reader = factory.createEDIStreamReader(source);

    try {
        while (reader.hasNext()) {
            switch (reader.next()) {
            case SEGMENT_ERROR:
            case ELEMENT_OCCURRENCE_ERROR:
            case ELEMENT_DATA_ERROR:
                fail("Unexpected error: " + reader.getErrorType());
            default:
                break;
            }
        }
    } catch (Exception e) {
        fail(e);
    } finally {
        reader.close();
    }
}

from staedi.

Hi @saravanan-periyasamy03 , please see my earlier comment. I was not able to reproduce the exception and will need some additional information or a test case that demonstrates the problem in order to identify a fix.

from staedi.

@saravanan-periyasamy03 , is this still an issue for you?

from staedi.

Closing for now due to inactivity. Please comment/reopen if this is still a problem.

from staedi.