add theme/domain info to !ref command about theoracle HOT 3 CLOSED

turn out i'd already done the long-form descriptions (as LongDescription) for all themes and domains; i've just added keys for page/source, so theme/domain data should now be complete save for their icons.

from theoracle.

now that delve sites are in, it might be worth revisiting this. it'd be useful to reference the description/table even outside of a delve (to use for inspiration instead of rolling, or to help pick which one to use before delving).

it occurs to me that there's might also be some value in presenting the combined Feature/Danger table, though. i think i'll do some mockups to explore how such a table might be displayed.

from theoracle.

turns out the theme/domain table contents actually fit within fields, so they could be used in inline fields to take advantage of the extra screen width on desktop:

even with the long form description, that's not too bad.

and frankly that's probably all that's strictly needed, but i tried building an aggregate table out of curiosity:

double themes/double domains might be trickier there, though. one way might be to include them on the same line as their partner result

i go back and forth on whether the general themes ought to be included there at all. they are easily available elsewhere with !ref reveal a danger but if the point is a conveniently referenceable aggregated table, then those are part of the oracle. however, they put the field contents over the limit, and so require their own (preferably not inline, as the features being rendered as three columns is... unpleasant).

rationale: i think seeing all the results together in aggregate might be useful to those looking for inspiration, those who just want to pick the most interesting feature/danger instead of rolling, and those who want to examine the resulting tables of a particular theme/domain combo before committing to it.

with all that said, an aggregated table would mostly be a matter of convenience, and while these are all things that i personally tend to do when considering a delve, other people might not be applying the same level of scrutiny to it. in other words, it might be too niche to be worthwhile.

from theoracle.