Citation rich static site generators about awesome-scientific-writing HOT 5 OPEN

In my opinion, the HTML export options of most tools are sufficient for "simple" science blogging. More complex projects can be realized with a CMS. There are several resources that cover this topic: https://github.com/sindresorhus/awesome#content-management-systems

from awesome-scientific-writing.

True, but static site generators are fairly common nowadays and there are many around. Hosting a CMS requires one to host a server. I use Pelican for my website and to keep the list of publications up to date I had used pelican-cite and now I use bibbase service.

Blogging is also a form of writing isn't it? 😔

from awesome-scientific-writing.

True, but static site generators are fairly common nowadays and there are many around. Hosting a CMS requires one to host a server. I use Pelican for my website and to keep the list of publications up to date I had used pelican-cite and now I use bibbase service.

Blogging is also a form of writing isn't it? 😔

Yes of course, blogging is essential for science and we should embrace it. I just have not found an awesome way to do it until now. How is Pelican in regard to SEO?

from awesome-scientific-writing.

SEO depends on the specific theme one uses since most of the metadata goes in the html headers. I think m.css - the theme that I use - does it by default. And here is another one:

https://elegant.oncrashreboot.com/search-engine-and-social-media-optimization

from awesome-scientific-writing.

@ashwinvis Can this issue be closed?

from awesome-scientific-writing.