SubscriptionId parameter not taken into account correctly in New-AzSentinelAlertRuleAction about azsentinel HOT 6 CLOSED

hi @sbroosnokia thanks for your feedback. So the logic app and Azure Sentinel are not in the same subscription in your test, is that correct?

from azsentinel.

They are in the same subscription, but in a different resourcegroup

from azsentinel.

Can you send me the command and also the verbose output? And does the function work if you don't specify a subscriptionID or use the JSON layout?

from azsentinel.

It also doesn't work when omitting the subscriptionId. I did not try the JSON layout. Logs have been redacted and shared over mail

from azsentinel.

Thanks for the great feedback. Found the problem and created a pr for the solution.. will merged in coming days and release a new version..
You can already download the compiled new version which is available in Github Actions: https://github.com/wortell/AZSentinel/suites/480280893/artifacts/2208721
Please let me know if it is possible for you to download and test the new version?

from azsentinel.

Hi, Thanks for the swift reply. That pull request seems to fix it. I could use the module to attach a playbook to my rule.

from azsentinel.