Comments (18)
tomakehurst
commented on May 18, 2024
1
I'm lacking access to a computer at the moment so I can't test this but it could be because your stub definition has a trailing slash but your http post doesn't
BTW, your @before block is unnecessary as reset() is called by the rule.
from wiremock.
maybeec
commented on May 18, 2024
I've added the trailing slash to the HttpPost
HttpPost httpPost = new HttpPost("http://localhost:9999/");Unfortunately this does not solve the problem.
from wiremock.
tomakehurst
commented on May 18, 2024
If you add a log4j notifier to the options passed to the rule and set it to verbose it'll log out why it didn't match at INFO.
from wiremock.
maybeec
commented on May 18, 2024
After adding the log4j Notifier as follows
@Rule
public WireMockRule wireMockRule = new WireMockRule(wireMockConfig().port(testPort).notifier(
new Log4jNotifier()));I got no more information, but several NullPointerExceptions :) Perhaps a bug?
[D: 2013-07-04 10:50:26,883] [P: INFO ] [T: 15087110@qtp-26116262-0] [L: /__admin] - [M: RequestHandlerClass from context returned com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.http.AdminRequestHandler]
[D: 2013-07-04 10:50:27,367] [P: INFO ] [T: 31003492@qtp-26116262-2] [L: /] - [M: RequestHandlerClass from context returned com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.http.StubRequestHandler]
[D: 2013-07-04 10:50:27,508] [P: ERROR] [T: main] [L: org.mortbay.log] - [M: EXCEPTION ]
java.lang.NullPointerException
at javax.servlet.GenericServlet.getServletContext(GenericServlet.java:205)
at javax.servlet.GenericServlet.log(GenericServlet.java:300)
at javax.servlet.GenericServlet.destroy(GenericServlet.java:122)
at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHolder.destroyInstance(ServletHolder.java:318)
at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHolder.doStop(ServletHolder.java:289)
at org.mortbay.component.AbstractLifeCycle.stop(AbstractLifeCycle.java:76)
at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.doStop(ServletHandler.java:185)
at org.mortbay.component.AbstractLifeCycle.stop(AbstractLifeCycle.java:76)
at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.HandlerWrapper.doStop(HandlerWrapper.java:142)
at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.ContextHandler.doStop(ContextHandler.java:592)
at org.mortbay.component.AbstractLifeCycle.stop(AbstractLifeCycle.java:76)
at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.HandlerCollection.doStop(HandlerCollection.java:169)
at org.mortbay.component.AbstractLifeCycle.stop(AbstractLifeCycle.java:76)
at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.HandlerWrapper.doStop(HandlerWrapper.java:142)
at org.mortbay.jetty.Server.doStop(Server.java:283)
at org.mortbay.component.AbstractLifeCycle.stop(AbstractLifeCycle.java:76)
at com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.WireMockServer.stop(WireMockServer.java:148)
at com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.junit.WireMockRule$1.evaluate(WireMockRule.java:66)
at org.springframework.test.context.junit4.statements.SpringRepeat.evaluate(SpringRepeat.java:72)
at org.springframework.test.context.junit4.SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.java:231)
at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:49)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:193)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:52)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:191)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:42)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:184)
at org.springframework.test.context.junit4.statements.RunBeforeTestClassCallbacks.evaluate(RunBeforeTestClassCallbacks.java:61)
at org.springframework.test.context.junit4.statements.RunAfterTestClassCallbacks.evaluate(RunAfterTestClassCallbacks.java:71)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:236)
at org.springframework.test.context.junit4.SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.run(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.java:174)
at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit4.runner.JUnit4TestReference.run(JUnit4TestReference.java:50)
at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.TestExecution.run(TestExecution.java:38)
at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:467)
at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:683)
at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.run(RemoteTestRunner.java:390)
at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.main(RemoteTestRunner.java:197)
[D: 2013-07-04 10:50:27,508] [P: ERROR] [T: main] [L: org.mortbay.log] - [M: EXCEPTION ]
java.lang.NullPointerException
at javax.servlet.GenericServlet.getServletContext(GenericServlet.java:205)
at javax.servlet.GenericServlet.log(GenericServlet.java:300)
at javax.servlet.GenericServlet.destroy(GenericServlet.java:122)
at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHolder.destroyInstance(ServletHolder.java:318)
at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHolder.doStop(ServletHolder.java:289)
at org.mortbay.component.AbstractLifeCycle.stop(AbstractLifeCycle.java:76)
at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.doStop(ServletHandler.java:185)
at org.mortbay.component.AbstractLifeCycle.stop(AbstractLifeCycle.java:76)
at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.HandlerWrapper.doStop(HandlerWrapper.java:142)
at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.ContextHandler.doStop(ContextHandler.java:592)
at org.mortbay.component.AbstractLifeCycle.stop(AbstractLifeCycle.java:76)
at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.HandlerCollection.doStop(HandlerCollection.java:169)
at org.mortbay.component.AbstractLifeCycle.stop(AbstractLifeCycle.java:76)
at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.HandlerWrapper.doStop(HandlerWrapper.java:142)
at org.mortbay.jetty.Server.doStop(Server.java:283)
at org.mortbay.component.AbstractLifeCycle.stop(AbstractLifeCycle.java:76)
at com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.WireMockServer.stop(WireMockServer.java:148)
at com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.junit.WireMockRule$1.evaluate(WireMockRule.java:66)
at org.springframework.test.context.junit4.statements.SpringRepeat.evaluate(SpringRepeat.java:72)
at org.springframework.test.context.junit4.SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.java:231)
at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:49)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:193)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:52)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:191)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:42)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:184)
at org.springframework.test.context.junit4.statements.RunBeforeTestClassCallbacks.evaluate(RunBeforeTestClassCallbacks.java:61)
at org.springframework.test.context.junit4.statements.RunAfterTestClassCallbacks.evaluate(RunAfterTestClassCallbacks.java:71)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:236)
at org.springframework.test.context.junit4.SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.run(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.java:174)
at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit4.runner.JUnit4TestReference.run(JUnit4TestReference.java:50)
at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.TestExecution.run(TestExecution.java:38)
at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:467)
at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:683)
at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.run(RemoteTestRunner.java:390)
at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.main(RemoteTestRunner.java:197)
from wiremock.
tomakehurst
commented on May 18, 2024
I think that exception is probably because you've got an additional, different version of the servlet API on your classpath. If you try excluding this (temporarily at least) so that only the Servlet API version pulled in via WireMock is present, this should go away.
from wiremock.
tomakehurst
commented on May 18, 2024
Looks like the same exception as in this issue (for which excluding the other Servlet API solved the issue):
https://github.com/tomakehurst/wiremock/issues/37
from wiremock.
maybeec
commented on May 18, 2024
Ok. the servlet issue solved the problem for debugging.
Now I get
[D: 2013-07-04 14:28:08,772] [P: INFO ] [T: 26116262@qtp-32879825-0] [L: /__admin] - [M: RequestHandlerClass from context returned com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.http.AdminRequestHandler]
[D: 2013-07-04 14:28:09,232] [P: INFO ] [T: 17621911@qtp-32879825-2] [L: /] - [M: RequestHandlerClass from context returned com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.http.StubRequestHandler]
thats all.... no additional information.
Remember, "verify" verifies the request done by the tested code snippet as follows
verify(postRequestedFor(urlEqualTo("/"))
.withHeader("Content-Type", equalTo("text/xml; charset=UTF-8"))
.withHeader("SOAPAction", equalTo("")).withRequestBody(equalTo(request)));from wiremock.
tomakehurst
commented on May 18, 2024
Probably because you're running with log4j defaults. Try calling Log4jConfigurer.configure (true); in your @before
from wiremock.
maybeec
commented on May 18, 2024
I do not use the default log4j properties, but I saw there is a restriction for com.* packages set to WARN :) So I changed this and get the following:
[D: 2013-07-04 14:49:28,252] [P: WARN ] [T: main] [L: org.dozer.config.GlobalSettings] - [M: Dozer configuration file not found: dozer.properties. Using defaults for all Dozer global properties.]
[D: 2013-07-04 14:49:29,003] [P: INFO ] [T: 15087110@qtp-26116262-0] [L: /__admin] - [M: RequestHandlerClass from context returned com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.http.AdminRequestHandler]
[D: 2013-07-04 14:49:29,013] [P: INFO ] [T: 15087110@qtp-26116262-0] [L: com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.common.Log4jNotifier] - [M: Received request to /mappings/new with body {
"request" : {
"url" : "/",
"method" : "GET"
},
"response" : {
"status" : 200,
"base64Body" : "QW55IFJlc3BvbnNlIDA="
}
}]
[D: 2013-07-04 14:49:29,433] [P: INFO ] [T: 31003492@qtp-26116262-2] [L: /] - [M: RequestHandlerClass from context returned com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.http.StubRequestHandler]
[D: 2013-07-04 14:49:29,433] [P: INFO ] [T: 31003492@qtp-26116262-2] [L: com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.common.Log4jNotifier] - [M: Received request to /]
[D: 2013-07-04 14:49:29,433] [P: INFO ] [T: 31003492@qtp-26116262-2] [L: com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.common.Log4jNotifier] - [M: URL / is match, but method POST is not]
[D: 2013-07-04 14:49:29,433] [P: INFO ] [T: 31003492@qtp-26116262-2] [L: com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.common.Log4jNotifier] - [M: No mapping found matching URL /]
[D: 2013-07-04 14:49:29,504] [P: INFO ] [T: 15087110@qtp-26116262-0] [L: com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.common.Log4jNotifier] - [M: Received request to /requests/count with body {
"url" : "/",
"method" : "POST",
"bodyPatterns" : [ {
"equalTo" : "Any Request 0"
} ],
"headers" : {
"Content-Type" : {
"equalTo" : "text/xml; charset=UTF-8"
},
"SOAPAction" : {
"equalTo" : ""
}
}
}]
from wiremock.
tomakehurst
commented on May 18, 2024
Ok, it looks like you've configured your stub for a GET only but are hitting it with a POST.
from wiremock.
tomakehurst
commented on May 18, 2024
Which version are you running?
from wiremock.
maybeec
commented on May 18, 2024
I am running v1.33 of WireMock. Where do I can configure the stub for POST requests?
from wiremock.
maybeec
commented on May 18, 2024
Wow, some hours of sleep make the job :)
It is the post before the url matcher which does this job...
post(urlEqualTo("/")As the term 'get', which is used in each example in the documentation, is some kind of overloaded in this case, in my opinion, the documentation should be a little bit clearer here :)
Nevertheless, thanks for you quick and helpful feedback and also thanks for WireMock! I love it! 👍
from wiremock.
JuliaIskra
commented on May 18, 2024
Hello, @tomakehurst !
Looks like I have the same problem - conflicted Http Client dependency.
As I understand from documentation this:
<classifier>standalone</classifier>
should solve the problem, but it is not.
How can I fix it?
from wiremock.
tomakehurst
commented on May 18, 2024
Yes, the docs aren't great in this regard.
The POM with the standalone version still (currently) pulls in the transitive dependencies, so you need to explicitly exclude the ones that are causing you problems e.g.
<exclusions>
<exclusion>
<groupId>com.google.guava</groupId>
<artifactId>guava</artifactId>
</exclusion>
</exclusions>from wiremock.
JuliaIskra
commented on May 18, 2024
No, this doesn't help.
I'm still getting ERROR 404
from wiremock.
JuliaIskra
commented on May 18, 2024
Sorry, I was thoughtless :)
Found the bug - it's the same as @may-bee had - get instead post
Thank you!
from wiremock.
sensoryorgan
commented on May 18, 2024
@tomakehurst Is it possible to exclude certain query parameter while running wiremock standalone?
tobe more precise while invoking an url e.g. http:\search.twitter.com?userid=1236524&name=stella&date=....
Can I do it in a way so that for all the urls invoked "userid" would not be considered while recording the response. So that if userid changes and rest of the url remains same, wiremock wont record the response again.
from wiremock.
Related Issues (20)
- Extensions always supplies a null TemplateEngine to ExtensionFactory
- Detect overlapping mock json in wiremock HOT 2
- Extension configuration validation HOT 1
- gradle-wrapper.jar is inconsistent with current gradle version. HOT 2
- Make it possible to configure level for SubEvents, or to make it possible to disable them
- Composable startup configuration with extra bindings HOT 1
- Support custom startup parameters for extensions HOT 5
- Cannot send 'large' SOAP requests with http2 HOT 2
- Remove/disable stub when it was called one time HOT 1
- Fail to process request with sub boundaries HOT 1
- Is it feasible to set the level of SubEvents or to make them inactive? HOT 1
- JSON decoding error HOT 2
- Decimals matching issue in wiremock 3.4.0 HOT 1
- Wiremock standalone 3: NoSuchMethodError HOT 1
- Wiremock not detecting POST body request by Spring 6 RestClient HOT 1
- WireMockExtension.stopServerIfRunning() produces NPE when Unit Test aborts unexpectedly
- Add option to preserve User-Agent in the proxied request header
- HTTP/2 not properly supported for PUT requests HOT 10
- Add project icon for IntelliJ
- EqualToXml does not detect difference on certain XML documents if Xalan is on classpath HOT 1
Recommend Projects
-
React
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
-
Vue.js
🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
-
Typescript
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
-
TensorFlow
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
-
Django
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
-
Laravel
A PHP framework for web artisans
-
D3
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉
-
Recommend Topics
-
javascript
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
-
web
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
-
server
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
-
Machine learning
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
-
Visualization
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
-
Game
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
Recommend Org
-
Facebook
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
-
Microsoft
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
-
Google
Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.
-
Alibaba
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
-
D3
Data-Driven Documents codes.
-
Tencent
China tencent open source team.
from wiremock.