Same effords about noise-suppression-for-voice HOT 3 CLOSED

Hi!
To be clear - I don't know much about sound processing and while I generally understand how the Xiph's library works I didn't do any modification to it.

So about inputs - when the input was lower than 48 Khz noise was still removed but with less accuracy, before I checked this I though to resample the input. It may yield better results but should be checked.

Because I mostly made the library for myself and because I'm not knowledgeable enough in sound processing I decided to stop at bare minimum and just make nice repository with relatively easy to follow instructions.

So in the end this project will not move anywhere or at least not by me, I think there will be something created out of original library by it's author but who knows... I'm just lacking knowledge in this field.

I may help if you'll want to make something more out of it (maybe you'll add Xiph's library as alternative processor to your project?) but every further improvement to the project is out of my knowledge - I know how to make games or website backends and don't know how create packages for linux repos or how to wrestle with pulseaudio which doesn't want my plugin to work without manually kicking it.

from noise-suppression-for-voice.

That's ok! No problem. Your work already helped me! I wasn't scaling to short values correctly. Now my plugin is working. From my test resampling gives pretty much the same result. RNNoise does much better as a VAD (vocal activity detector) than denoising algorithm. I can see how to integrate it to my other denoising plugin as that. Thank you very much! I can close this now.

from noise-suppression-for-voice.

Good to know! If it's going to work even better with your plugin it would be awesome, I'll try it out in future.

from noise-suppression-for-voice.