Comments (9)
Yes, I think so! My previous R professor, Brooke Anderson, is an Associate Editor of rOpenSci. I see her for a dinner next Tuesday and will ask her about this.
from psyphr.
Wow! If she could provide some guidance in the package development from early on, it will be awesome.
Also I've recently realized that many many wonderful R users and developers are women; this is something that's quite unique about R, as a computer language; and all R conferences or meetups I've been to has a healthy gender mix, a contrast to even those of JavaScript. I've also just stumbled across this article today, which did a really good analysis on the phenomenon.
from psyphr.
Yes! Let me know if you have any specific questions you would like me to pass on to Brooke tomorrow night.
Brooke is actually the reason that 1) I know what I know about R; 2) I love R and am so eager to learn; and 3) I attended the Uncoast Unconf. I owe so much to her. She is a role model to me, and I hope to do the same for other students, particularly women and psychologists/social scientists, in the future. I never want to be considered excellent in a certain skill (e.g., R programming) because I am a woman, but, rather, be an R programmer who happens to be a woman.
from psyphr.
Roger Peng's blog post about publishing software
from psyphr.
from psyphr.
G.B.A. (06/23/2019) on rOpenSci review timeline and connection to CRAN:
"The [peer review] timeline definitely varies from package to package, and some depends on how long it takes to find reviewers and how long it takes your group to make changes in response to the reviewers. For most, peer reviews are in within about two months of the submission, I think. Usually then there's a more interactive process of responding to those reviews and then the reviewers commenting back on those responses. The whole process is open, so the best way to get an idea is to look through some previous or in-progress reviewers: https://github.com/ropensci/software-review/issues
Yes, ROpenSci packages can definitely also go on CRAN. I think the official recommendation is to finish the ROpenSci process before submitting to CRAN, in case you make a lot of changes based on the review process. Once you get something on CRAN, you'll want to avoid making a lot of changes to things that affect the users' interface, so you won't break other people's code (e.g., function names, arguments to functions)."
from psyphr.
Thanks @wendtke. Great information. I think this has cleared a lot of cloud.
from psyphr.
Update from discussion with @geanders on 20190701.
- Provide strong justification for why
psyphr
fits within scope of rOpenSci, specifically in the data munging category. - "Complete" submission might include support for full MW 3.2 output suite; exploratory analysis and visualization options; full vignettes + tutorial via
packagedocs
. - @geanders will recuse self from peer review process and be listed as author or contributor
from psyphr.
See #47 for full timeline; refer back here if needed
from psyphr.
Related Issues (20)
- Mechanism to drop (HRV) segments shorter than 30 seconds HOT 3
- Update description file (authors, contributors, funders, acknowledgements) HOT 3
- Collect dummy data for use in munging/viz/analysis examples, vignettes, tutorials HOT 3
- TIMELINE: rOpenSci > CRAN > journal
- License HOT 7
- Supporting BIOPAC output HOT 7
- Review survey responses & reactions
- Evaluate BIDS Schema HOT 4
- MW BioLab Epoch File? HOT 1
- Implement GBA code suggestions HOT 6
- Follow {tidyverse} principles HOT 2
- For exported functions, put examples in roxygen notes
- Study/file size HOT 10
- Downstream analyses: Common approaches and use cases HOT 5
- Quality control guidelines, filters, & meta-data
- MAD/MED check
- On-disk caching HOT 2
- Is it necessary to make a View() generic for psyphr_study? HOT 3
- BIDS Formatting HOT 1
- Transfer issues to psyphr-dev and respective package HOT 5
Recommend Projects
-
React
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
-
Vue.js
🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
-
Typescript
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
-
TensorFlow
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
-
Django
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
-
Laravel
A PHP framework for web artisans
-
D3
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉
-
Recommend Topics
-
javascript
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
-
web
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
-
server
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
-
Machine learning
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
-
Visualization
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
-
Game
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
Recommend Org
-
Facebook
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
-
Microsoft
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
-
Google
Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.
-
Alibaba
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
-
D3
Data-Driven Documents codes.
-
Tencent
China tencent open source team.
from psyphr.