Giter Club home page Giter Club logo

Comments (5)

webdesus avatar webdesus commented on September 15, 2024 1

Thank you for your feedback, i will improve docs :)

from fs_extra.

webdesus avatar webdesus commented on September 15, 2024

Sorry, but fs_extra does not exist method dir_copy. fs_extra have this method fs_extra::dir::copy which contains third argument copy_options, where you can set necessary settings for copy operation.

If you are expected this c/d/b behavior, you should set true for the copy_inside property of copy_option object

from fs_extra.

dpc avatar dpc commented on September 15, 2024

This is all not well explained in documentation. I was able to figure it out myself, but it require some trail and error.

from fs_extra.

ctron avatar ctron commented on September 15, 2024

I have to agree that the semantics are are bit weird:

Taking a look at the copy function:

    if options.copy_inside {
        if to.exists() {
            if let Some(dir_name) = from.components().last() {
                to.push(dir_name.as_os_str());
            } else {
                err!("Invalid folder from", ErrorKind::InvalidFolder);
            }
        }
    } else {
        if let Some(dir_name) = from.components().last() {
            to.push(dir_name.as_os_str());
        } else {
            err!("Invalid folder from", ErrorKind::InvalidFolder);
        }
    }

Depending on the fact that the target directory exists or not, the outcome is different. And there seems to be no way to influence that.

e.g.: copying a/b from a to c, setting copy_inside=true will result in:

  • c/b - if c does not exist
  • or c/a/b - if c did already exist

So the behavior of copy with copy_inside=true is not as cp -r.

Which causes as problem when you want to copy from multiple source directories, to a single target directory with copy_inside=true.

Also is the documentation of https://docs.rs/fs_extra/1.1.0/fs_extra/dir/fn.copy.html wrong IMHO. It refers to a non-existing copy option named mirror_copy.

I guess the right fix would be to simple drop the "if exists" check for copy_inside.

from fs_extra.

webdesus avatar webdesus commented on September 15, 2024

Hi @ctron,

is not as cp -r

I checked right now behaviors cp -r and this behavior the same as mine. These operations have a different outcome if the target folder exists or doesn't ...

It refers to a non-existing copy option named mirror_copy.

My bad... i missed this moment, when changed old name(mirror_copy) by new (copy_inside)

from fs_extra.

Related Issues (20)

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.