Hi Laura, this will be addressed in the redesign, but I question the use of the <code> element for the URL here anyway. Do we really need to put the URL here or are we able to just link “inaccessible home page”, @slhenry & @vuxcaleb?

from wai-easy-checks.

Font size:

I checked the font size of the overall page and [code] in a few browsers, and they all handle it differently. :(
I propose that we take out of the CSS for [code] "font-size: 95%;"

URL

I think the decision to include the URL was to support people who print the instructions. (For some people, that is much easier than toggling back and forth, or having multiple windows displayed.) I propose that we leave it as is for this version, and we can address it later if people think it is important.

code on URLs

I propose that we leave it as is for this version, and we can address it later if people think it is important.

OK?

from wai-easy-checks.

I don't think that a link should be wrapped in a <code> tag. If you want to leave it in for this version I'm ok with that but I do think it should be removed and the font size for the link should be fixed in this version if possible.

from wai-easy-checks.

• Font Size: +1 to remove font-size: 95% for <code>. I guess the difference of the browsers depend a bit on the chosen monospace font and on how the font size is rounded (I think it is 16px ⨉ 0.90 ⨉ 0.95 = 13.68px).
• URL: I guess we will have a good print stylesheet that automatically shows the URL after links using CSS once the redesign is upon us :-)
• +1 to postpone a decision on the code element on the URL, it is a secondary (tertiary?) issue imo.

from wai-easy-checks.

+1 for changing font size as well.
Okay with leaving URL and/or addressing it later.

from wai-easy-checks.

CSS for [code] "font-size: 95%;" <-- deleted

from wai-easy-checks.

Closed as no longer relevant to new version of the resource

from wai-easy-checks.