missing spec-label about w3c.github.io HOT 7 CLOSED

It depends on the point of this process. I had understood that the idea was that we should use these labels - reducing our own labels to whatever this set becomes.

Personally, I think that's a non-starter, so if this is just a set of common labels for common tasks, which should be extended by whoever manages each individual repo, I think we have a reasonable set.

from w3c.github.io.

Also, I prefer to use invalid for something where there is nothing to do here - no real bug, and be able to declare out-of-scope more explicitly, e.g. so another spec can pick it up.

For the same reason, having a generic tag for review from someone else can be helpful , where there is no specific label for the group in question.

from w3c.github.io.

Looks good to me, more so if it comes from experience :)

I think that in case of doubt we can use
labels_plh ∪ labels_chaals
to suit all needs.

from w3c.github.io.

I added most of the tags we have for HTML, which is the repo where I thought most about labels.

from w3c.github.io.

I'm worried about the labels overly complicated here. I do think it's fine for a group to add more labels if needed. Imho, the most important labels are the horizontal ones.

from w3c.github.io.

Yes, I also think whatever appears on w3c.github.io/spec-labels.html is just a baseline or a recommendation, and that groups should be free to extend that set in any way they feel is useful for them.

from w3c.github.io.

let's see if the current set is common enough.

from w3c.github.io.