Giter Club home page Giter Club logo

Comments (2)

videowikips avatar videowikips commented on June 15, 2024

Thanks for your comment. As you rightly mentioned, these are "references" and not "watermarks". Since a video is a collection of various other video/image files from Commons - two information is generally shared:

  1. The author of the media file.
  2. The License of the media file.

Additionally, these information is also added to the description in the Commons media file page.

Do you think adding the references for each media file redundant? Thoughts?

One of the reasons for the references is that the same pattern is followed when displaying an image/media content on the WMF Blog. See attachment for reference.
WMF  Blog referencing standards

from videowiki.

17jiangz1 avatar 17jiangz1 commented on June 15, 2024

Thanks for your prompt reply. Per COM:WATERMARK, the current approach of referencing seems to fall within the definition of a watermark:

A watermark is content embedded in a creative work that is not part of the creative work itself, and is used by the creator and/or copyright holder of the work to assert authorship and/or copyright, and to support the identification of unauthorised copying of their work.

With the approach used by the WMF Blog, the referencing is not visibly embedded into the media file itself. I think the current approach of embedding the references in the media file redundant and visually distracting, and such information should only belong in the file description page which is easily accessible to anyone who want the referencing information. With regards to on the authorship and licensing information for files derivative of multiple works, the current approach of referencing in the file description seems to be already sufficient, perhaps timestamps could be added for clarity.

Also with regards to compiling images with different licenses, license compatibility should also be taken into account (see Commons:Collages), although it could be argued that the videos are considered a collection, and not adaption of the source content, in which case the licensing would be independent of the source images (see Commons:Adaptation and Collection
).

from videowiki.

Related Issues (7)

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.