Giter Club home page Giter Club logo

Comments (8)

daschl avatar daschl commented on May 28, 2024

I think the big difference is that the static method checks for Late Static Binding while the "old" method does not. I think this is an interesting question and nate should comment on how we would benefit from this or not?

edit: actually it could be possible that call_user_func_array also checks for lsb since 5.3.. hm...

from lithium.

intel352 avatar intel352 commented on May 28, 2024

Ha, if late static binding is supported in call_user_func_array, then why would they add forward_static_call_array? Seems quite redundant...

Not doubting you btw, just wondering what they were thinking if that's the case :-)

from lithium.

daschl avatar daschl commented on May 28, 2024

Actually it is the LSB part. This returns "BA" and shows the difference.

<?php

class A {

    public static function who() {
        echo __CLASS__;
    }

    public static function test() {
        echo static::who();
    }
}

class B extends A {

    public static function who() {
        echo __CLASS__;
    }

    public static function test() {
        forward_static_call(array('A', 'test'));
        call_user_func(array('A', 'test'));
    }
}

B::test('foo');

?>

from lithium.

intel352 avatar intel352 commented on May 28, 2024

So does that suggest that it's better to use forward_static_call or call_user_func in this scenario?

from lithium.

daschl avatar daschl commented on May 28, 2024

I think we should give it a try and see if all test cases pass. If they do, let's consider it on IRC with the core devs and choose what makes sense.

from lithium.

daschl avatar daschl commented on May 28, 2024

Update: I don't get any failing tests with this enhacement. Can someone crosscheck before we push it to master?

from lithium.

intel352 avatar intel352 commented on May 28, 2024

Did log behavior change any? Such as referencing which class called a
method? I think this change would only alter the value of get_called_class.

  • Jon Langevin -- sent from my Android phone
    On Jul 7, 2011 9:10 AM, "daschl" <
    [email protected]>
    wrote:

    Update: I don't get any failing tests with this enhacement. Can someone
    crosscheck before we push it to master?

    --
    Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
    #23 (comment)

from lithium.

daschl avatar daschl commented on May 28, 2024

This ticket has been merged into master, thanks again!

from lithium.

Related Issues (20)

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.