Contained Item Class validation not working about ukl-registry-poc HOT 2 CLOSED

Validator now implemented and includes case of register having a containedItemClass constraint.

Currently implemented that multiple reg:containedItemClass entries are disjunctive. No such constraint means anything can be added. Multiple constraints means that item must have at least of the listed classes. This seemed more useful that the conjunctive version and since we are working in a closed world here then it is implementable.

If that's agreed then I'll make it clearer in the documentation.

from ukl-registry-poc.

Dave - I think it is correct to assume that an entity must express at least
one of the types declared in reg:containedItemClass. It is too strict to
assume that a given entity must be all of the declared types.

Jeremy

On 22 March 2013 15:48, Dave Reynolds [email protected] wrote:

Validator now implemented and includes case of register having a
containedItemClass constraint.

Currently implemented that multiple reg:containedItemClass entries are
disjunctive. No such constraint means anything can be added. Multiple
constraints means that item must have at least of the listed classes. This
seemed more useful that the conjunctive version and since we are working in
a closed world here then it is implementable.

If that's agreed then I'll make it clearer in the documentation.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/31#issuecomment-15304298
.

from ukl-registry-poc.