Registry appears to use different version of LDP ontology about registry-core HOT 3 CLOSED

The registers actually use reg:inverseMembershipPredicate but apart from
that this is correct.

At the time the registry software was developed there was only a working
draft of LDP to go on. Since then LDP, both the protocol and the
vocabulary, have changed considerably.

A decision would have to be made on the relative benefits of changing
this and breaking backward compatibility. The protocol changes are
probably the more disruptive but I've not looked at the details.

Dave

On 20/05/14 01:20, Simon Cox wrote:

Registers in the registry have properties
ldp:membershipPredicate
ldp:inverseMembershipPredicate
The LDP Ontology published at http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp has
ldp:hasMemberRelation
ldp:isMemberOfRelation
instead.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#7.

from registry-core.

I take your point if it is still a moving target.
But in the long run, it would be bizarre to see predicates in action with URIs that no longer resolve to anything useful!

from registry-core.

I've added support for the ldp:hasMemberRelation and ldp:isMemberOfRelation in addition to the prior ldp:membershipPredicate and reg:inverseMembershipPredicate.

This should make it possible for new applications to use the new versions of LDP without breaking existing usage.

from registry-core.