`raw()` function doesn't add `block` field to the `raw` element (unlike the raw syntax sugar) about typst HOT 8 CLOSED

If it's easy to fix, then I want to do it myself (with a hint at the problem place).

from typst.

This is working as intended. Fields are only present if explicitly set, so that they can still be affected by set rules otherwise. It's the same for all other elements. In a show rule, the field will also be populated since the style context is known by then.

from typst.

Maybe we can have a hint for this specific case (the field normally exists but was omitted by the constructor, so it's not yet known)?

from typst.

Sure

from typst.

In a show rule, the field will also be populated since the style context is known by then.

I don't know what you mean, since this is not true:

from typst.

elem doesn't seem to be the subject of the show rule in that case (Laurenz was referring specifically to the case where the raw comes from it in #show raw: it => ... instead of from #let myraw = raw(...)).

from typst.

Maybe we can have a hint for this specific case (the field normally exists but was omitted by the constructor, so it's not yet known)?

Maybe something like field {} in content is not set at this point?

from typst.

Laurenz was referring specifically to the case where the raw comes from it in #show raw: it => ....

Mmm, yeah, I have a general document show rule instead.

from typst.