Order of arguments to defc about rum HOT 3 CLOSED

Yes, I’m feeling the same about it. I want to wait a little, gather other issues with syntax, macro etc, and when I have more data, maybe a better solution will emerge

from rum.

What do you think about specifying mixins as metadata? Like (defc name ^{:mixins []} args & body)? In that case it makes it very clear what is this list of things, so that there is no confusion. On the other hand, mixins are not metadata really...

from rum.

I’m thinking something like this:

(rum/defc watcher < debug rum/reactive [s]
  [:div (str s ": " (rum/react a))])

Both debug and rum/reactive are mixins. Have no idea how many syntax highlighters it will break. LightTable doesn’t mind

from rum.