Potentially inconsistent state about wild-workouts-go-ddd-example HOT 2 CLOSED

Hey @steven-eckhoff, it's great to hear the project was helpful. :)

You are absolutely right, and I'm glad you spotted this. This has been already discussed in the comments section on our blog, so I'll just link Robert's response: http://disq.us/p/2d0c44i

This is one of many subtle issues we introduced in the project on purpose, so they can be then refactored later. We'll cover this in one of future posts.

I already described one of the solutions to this in When an SQL database makes a great Pub/Sub, ("Pattern 2: Transactional Events").

We probably will use another approach in Wild Workouts, though. Thanks for raising this! :)

from wild-workouts-go-ddd-example.

Thanks for the links. I will give them a read.

from wild-workouts-go-ddd-example.