Comments (7)
Hi there,
sorry for the huge delay - I'm really busy these days. :-/
Your update rate requirements depend a little bit on the speed of your host controller. With Atmega 328 at 16 MHz I have no troubles in getting updates at a minimum (!) of 30Hz for one tag/anchor setup. So 100Hz should be doable with a faster controller, I guess.
By using the LONG_RANGE_... modes that you can use for the driver mode configuration I get ranges of over 60m. Although there is still space for optimization, e.g. regarding power management and some other bits and flags.
So, what is your current setup like and what ranges/update frequencies do you experience?
Thanks and hope it helps a bit!
Thomas
from arduino-dw1000.
Thanks Thomas,
I appreciate your response. I am having some break-out boards manufactured at the moment to make my setup more robust. I shall do some testing when they come in (next week hopefully) and come back to you with some real data. I am running on Atmega 328 at 8 MHz - it sounds like I need a new processor!
I'll be back with data.
NS
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 06:28:48 -0800
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [arduino-dw1000] Two Way Ranging - change message rate (#46)
Hi there,
sorry for the huge delay - I'm really busy these days. :-/
Your update rate requirements depend a little bit on the speed of your host controller. With Atmega 328 at 16 MHz I have no troubles in getting updates at a minimum (!) of 30Hz for one tag/anchor setup. So 100Hz should be doable with a faster controller, I guess.
By using the LONG_RANGE_... modes that you can use for the driver mode configuration I get ranges of over 60m. Although there is still space for optimization, e.g. regarding power management and some other bits and flags.
So, what is your current setup like and what ranges/update frequencies do you experience?
Thanks and hope it helps a bit!
Thomas
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
from arduino-dw1000.
oooh, breakout boards. Mind sharing??
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 9:04 AM, NewStart14 [email protected] wrote:
Thanks Thomas,
I appreciate your response. I am having some break-out boards manufactured
at the moment to make my setup more robust. I shall do some testing when
they come in (next week hopefully) and come back to you with some real
data. I am running on Atmega 328 at 8 MHz - it sounds like I need a new
processor!I'll be back with data.
NS
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 06:28:48 -0800
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [arduino-dw1000] Two Way Ranging - change message rate (#46)Hi there,
sorry for the huge delay - I'm really busy these days. :-/
Your update rate requirements depend a little bit on the speed of your
host controller. With Atmega 328 at 16 MHz I have no troubles in getting
updates at a minimum (!) of 30Hz for one tag/anchor setup. So 100Hz should
be doable with a faster controller, I guess.By using the LONG_RANGE_... modes that you can use for the driver mode
configuration I get ranges of over 60m. Although there is still space for
optimization, e.g. regarding power management and some other bits and flags.So, what is your current setup like and what ranges/update frequencies do
you experience?Thanks and hope it helps a bit!
Thomas
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#46 (comment)
.
David Russell
3D Solutions
Technical Director and Spatial Processing
204.391.3880
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended solely
for the addressee(s)
and may contain confidential and/or privileged information and may be
legally protected from
disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or their
agent, or if this message
has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender by
reply email and then
delete this message and any attachments. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are hereby
notified that any use, dissemination, copying, or storage of this message
or its attachments is
strictly prohibited.
from arduino-dw1000.
"Manufactured" was a bit of an embellishment, they are being made by someone with better soldering skills than myself(!) - no gerbers I'm afraid. The adapterboard on here looks pretty good already.
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 07:31:33 -0800
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [arduino-dw1000] Two Way Ranging - change message rate (#46)
oooh, breakout boards. Mind sharing??
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 9:04 AM, NewStart14 [email protected] wrote:
Thanks Thomas,
I appreciate your response. I am having some break-out boards manufactured
at the moment to make my setup more robust. I shall do some testing when
they come in (next week hopefully) and come back to you with some real
data. I am running on Atmega 328 at 8 MHz - it sounds like I need a new
processor!
I'll be back with data.
NS
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 06:28:48 -0800
From: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [arduino-dw1000] Two Way Ranging - change message rate (#46)
Hi there,
sorry for the huge delay - I'm really busy these days. :-/
Your update rate requirements depend a little bit on the speed of your
host controller. With Atmega 328 at 16 MHz I have no troubles in getting
updates at a minimum (!) of 30Hz for one tag/anchor setup. So 100Hz should
be doable with a faster controller, I guess.
By using the LONG_RANGE_... modes that you can use for the driver mode
configuration I get ranges of over 60m. Although there is still space for
optimization, e.g. regarding power management and some other bits and flags.
So, what is your current setup like and what ranges/update frequencies do
you experience?
Thanks and hope it helps a bit!
Thomas
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
.
David Russell
3D Solutions
Technical Director and Spatial Processing
204.391.3880
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended solely
for the addressee(s)
and may contain confidential and/or privileged information and may be
legally protected from
disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or their
agent, or if this message
has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender by
reply email and then
delete this message and any attachments. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are hereby
notified that any use, dissemination, copying, or storage of this message
or its attachments is
strictly prohibited.
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
from arduino-dw1000.
Ah, thanks. I have not even opened my dw100's. I have a bag of them waiting
for my current contract to wrap up.
Looking forward to contributing.
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 9:37 AM, NewStart14 [email protected] wrote:
"Manufactured" was a bit of an embellishment, they are being made by
someone with better soldering skills than myself(!) - no gerbers I'm
afraid. The adapterboard on here looks pretty good already.Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 07:31:33 -0800
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [arduino-dw1000] Two Way Ranging - change message rate (#46)oooh, breakout boards. Mind sharing??
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 9:04 AM, NewStart14 [email protected]
wrote:Thanks Thomas,
I appreciate your response. I am having some break-out boards
manufacturedat the moment to make my setup more robust. I shall do some testing when
they come in (next week hopefully) and come back to you with some real
data. I am running on Atmega 328 at 8 MHz - it sounds like I need a new
processor!
I'll be back with data.
NS
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 06:28:48 -0800
From: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [arduino-dw1000] Two Way Ranging - change message rate (#46)
Hi there,
sorry for the huge delay - I'm really busy these days. :-/
Your update rate requirements depend a little bit on the speed of your
host controller. With Atmega 328 at 16 MHz I have no troubles in getting
updates at a minimum (!) of 30Hz for one tag/anchor setup. So 100Hz
shouldbe doable with a faster controller, I guess.
By using the LONG_RANGE_... modes that you can use for the driver mode
configuration I get ranges of over 60m. Although there is still space for
optimization, e.g. regarding power management and some other bits and
flags.So, what is your current setup like and what ranges/update frequencies do
you experience?
Thanks and hope it helps a bit!
Thomas
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
<
https://github.com/thotro/arduino-dw1000/issues/46#issuecomment-154086256>.
David Russell
3D Solutions
Technical Director and Spatial Processing
204.391.3880
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended solely
for the addressee(s)
and may contain confidential and/or privileged information and may be
legally protected from
disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or their
agent, or if this message
has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender by
reply email and then
delete this message and any attachments. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are hereby
notified that any use, dissemination, copying, or storage of this message
or its attachments is
strictly prohibited.
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#46 (comment)
.
David Russell
3D Solutions
Technical Director and Spatial Processing
204.391.3880
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended solely
for the addressee(s)
and may contain confidential and/or privileged information and may be
legally protected from
disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or their
agent, or if this message
has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender by
reply email and then
delete this message and any attachments. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are hereby
notified that any use, dissemination, copying, or storage of this message
or its attachments is
strictly prohibited.
from arduino-dw1000.
I think I've posted this before, but here's a link to the adapter I had
made.
https://oshpark.com/shared_projects/8M99bseq
Price: About $7 for three boards.
Greg
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 8:12 AM, David Russell [email protected]
wrote:
Ah, thanks. I have not even opened my dw100's. I have a bag of them waiting
for my current contract to wrap up.
Looking forward to contributing.On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 9:37 AM, NewStart14 [email protected]
wrote:"Manufactured" was a bit of an embellishment, they are being made by
someone with better soldering skills than myself(!) - no gerbers I'm
afraid. The adapterboard on here looks pretty good already.Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 07:31:33 -0800
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [arduino-dw1000] Two Way Ranging - change message rate (#46)oooh, breakout boards. Mind sharing??
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 9:04 AM, NewStart14 [email protected]
wrote:Thanks Thomas,
I appreciate your response. I am having some break-out boards
manufacturedat the moment to make my setup more robust. I shall do some testing
whenthey come in (next week hopefully) and come back to you with some real
data. I am running on Atmega 328 at 8 MHz - it sounds like I need a new
processor!
I'll be back with data.
NS
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 06:28:48 -0800
From: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [arduino-dw1000] Two Way Ranging - change message rate
(#46)Hi there,
sorry for the huge delay - I'm really busy these days. :-/
Your update rate requirements depend a little bit on the speed of your
host controller. With Atmega 328 at 16 MHz I have no troubles in
gettingupdates at a minimum (!) of 30Hz for one tag/anchor setup. So 100Hz
shouldbe doable with a faster controller, I guess.
By using the LONG_RANGE_... modes that you can use for the driver mode
configuration I get ranges of over 60m. Although there is still space
foroptimization, e.g. regarding power management and some other bits and
flags.So, what is your current setup like and what ranges/update frequencies
doyou experience?
Thanks and hope it helps a bit!
Thomas
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
<
https://github.com/thotro/arduino-dw1000/issues/46#issuecomment-154086256>
.
David Russell
3D Solutions
Technical Director and Spatial Processing
204.391.3880
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended
solelyfor the addressee(s)
and may contain confidential and/or privileged information and may be
legally protected from
disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or
theiragent, or if this message
has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender
byreply email and then
delete this message and any attachments. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are hereby
notified that any use, dissemination, copying, or storage of this message
or its attachments is
strictly prohibited.
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
<
https://github.com/thotro/arduino-dw1000/issues/46#issuecomment-154096082>
.David Russell
3D Solutions
Technical Director and Spatial Processing
204.391.3880CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended solely
for the addressee(s)
and may contain confidential and/or privileged information and may be
legally protected from
disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or their
agent, or if this message
has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender by
reply email and then
delete this message and any attachments. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are hereby
notified that any use, dissemination, copying, or storage of this message
or its attachments is
strictly prohibited.—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#46 (comment)
.
from arduino-dw1000.
Nice, I just ordered 6 :)
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Greg Clark [email protected]
wrote:
I think I've posted this before, but here's a link to the adapter I had
made.https://oshpark.com/shared_projects/8M99bseq
Price: About $7 for three boards.
Greg
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 8:12 AM, David Russell [email protected]
wrote:Ah, thanks. I have not even opened my dw100's. I have a bag of them
waiting
for my current contract to wrap up.
Looking forward to contributing.On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 9:37 AM, NewStart14 [email protected]
wrote:"Manufactured" was a bit of an embellishment, they are being made by
someone with better soldering skills than myself(!) - no gerbers I'm
afraid. The adapterboard on here looks pretty good already.Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 07:31:33 -0800
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [arduino-dw1000] Two Way Ranging - change message rate
(#46)oooh, breakout boards. Mind sharing??
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 9:04 AM, NewStart14 [email protected]
wrote:Thanks Thomas,
I appreciate your response. I am having some break-out boards
manufacturedat the moment to make my setup more robust. I shall do some testing
whenthey come in (next week hopefully) and come back to you with some
realdata. I am running on Atmega 328 at 8 MHz - it sounds like I need a
newprocessor!
I'll be back with data.
NS
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 06:28:48 -0800
From: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [arduino-dw1000] Two Way Ranging - change message rate
(#46)Hi there,
sorry for the huge delay - I'm really busy these days. :-/
Your update rate requirements depend a little bit on the speed of
yourhost controller. With Atmega 328 at 16 MHz I have no troubles in
gettingupdates at a minimum (!) of 30Hz for one tag/anchor setup. So 100Hz
shouldbe doable with a faster controller, I guess.
By using the LONG_RANGE_... modes that you can use for the driver
modeconfiguration I get ranges of over 60m. Although there is still space
foroptimization, e.g. regarding power management and some other bits and
flags.So, what is your current setup like and what ranges/update
frequencies
doyou experience?
Thanks and hope it helps a bit!
Thomas
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
<
https://github.com/thotro/arduino-dw1000/issues/46#issuecomment-154086256>
.
David Russell
3D Solutions
Technical Director and Spatial Processing
204.391.3880
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended
solelyfor the addressee(s)
and may contain confidential and/or privileged information and may be
legally protected from
disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or
theiragent, or if this message
has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender
byreply email and then
delete this message and any attachments. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are hereby
notified that any use, dissemination, copying, or storage of this
messageor its attachments is
strictly prohibited.
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
<https://github.com/thotro/arduino-dw1000/issues/46#issuecomment-154096082>
.
David Russell
3D Solutions
Technical Director and Spatial Processing
204.391.3880CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended
solely
for the addressee(s)
and may contain confidential and/or privileged information and may be
legally protected from
disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or
their
agent, or if this message
has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender
by
reply email and then
delete this message and any attachments. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are hereby
notified that any use, dissemination, copying, or storage of this message
or its attachments is
strictly prohibited.—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
<
https://github.com/thotro/arduino-dw1000/issues/46#issuecomment-154106358>.
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#46 (comment)
.
David Russell
3D Solutions
Technical Director and Spatial Processing
204.391.3880
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended solely
for the addressee(s)
and may contain confidential and/or privileged information and may be
legally protected from
disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or their
agent, or if this message
has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender by
reply email and then
delete this message and any attachments. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are hereby
notified that any use, dissemination, copying, or storage of this message
or its attachments is
strictly prohibited.
from arduino-dw1000.
Related Issues (20)
- chage ANCHOR number
- DW1000 shield for Arduino Nano (Nucleo-32)
- Would it be possible to let the DW1000 module be TAG and ANCHOR at the same time?
- DWM1000 NodeMCU Esp8266 3 anchors and 1 Tag HOT 3
- Problems with BasicReceiver and BasicSender
- No connection: Compatible with Board DWS1000 (Arduino Uno)?
- Hello Sir : Could you support DWM3000 library?? Thank you.
- multi anchor or tag on 1 arduino ? can be done if os how ?
- Missing return
- Why is the "checkForReset" method so necessary for Anchor?
- Why choosing DEFAULT_REPLY_DELAY_TIME: 7000us?. Can/how i change it?
- Can you halp me? How to connect and program Adapter board max2001/dwm1000? (Arduino nano)
- Arduino Pro mini & DWM1000 HOT 3
- DW1000 Soft-Reset Issue
- Connecting time between tag and anchor HOT 1
- Possible error within the tune function regarding transmit power.
- TDoA implementation for DWM1000 HOT 1
- Apparent internal limitation of four anchors? HOT 1
- Schematic Review: Custom PCB for DW1000.
- Adding more tags to the system HOT 9
Recommend Projects
-
React
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
-
Vue.js
🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
-
Typescript
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
-
TensorFlow
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
-
Django
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
-
Laravel
A PHP framework for web artisans
-
D3
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉
-
Recommend Topics
-
javascript
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
-
web
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
-
server
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
-
Machine learning
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
-
Visualization
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
-
Game
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
Recommend Org
-
Facebook
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
-
Microsoft
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
-
Google
Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.
-
Alibaba
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
-
D3
Data-Driven Documents codes.
-
Tencent
China tencent open source team.
from arduino-dw1000.