Starz, watch and github forks about awesome-dotnet-core HOT 20 CLOSED

I disagree by adding stars to the repository. This might give unfair disadvantage to the newer repositories which might be better than the old one but user will not check them because old repository have more stars. Also user will make in this case wrong choice which lib to use.

from awesome-dotnet-core.

Be aware that once a project is feature complete, there is rarely a reason to change it. If dependencies don't change and other circumstances stay the same -- the project will "seem" dead even though it isn't.

An example would be any form of maths / calculations / algorithms library. Once they're done .. they're done.

from awesome-dotnet-core.

Why should we do that ? I don't think is necessary
Firstly it would look kinda messy since we have a lot of repo in readme

scans all links and update the stars count
Secondly I think there are no tool help us to do that

from awesome-dotnet-core.

Maybe add second page, that starz source page and added in repositroy ?
I could write it. its very simple !

from awesome-dotnet-core.

By count of statz and forks we could make objective analyz that repository will supported in future! And on what stage is library! Alpha,stable and how many users is use it ! For example this is veujs ui framework that has https://github.com/ElemeFE/element

27 k stars! I think is repo has LTS!
Any others ui lib for vuejs still have no 10k stars!

from awesome-dotnet-core.

If you can do that please submit PR and I will review it.
Thank you

from awesome-dotnet-core.

If U call
https://api.github.com/repos/jasonrudolph/keyboard

Then api returns !

Need to write some app that by cycle checks all urls and write stars to md file !

from awesome-dotnet-core.

And this would help
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/csharp/tutorials/console-webapiclient

from awesome-dotnet-core.

What do others do here.. Let their CI system commit back to the repository?

There's no point in maintaining this by running a tool manually.

from awesome-dotnet-core.

There Have another Good vision. Is the date of last Commit! For example it could be september of 2013 or january of 2018.

Look at https://github.com/icsharpcode/AvalonEdit
The AvalonEdit project is dead ! Every body could create superb project, but not anybody maintain them to the present days! To mantain project, must be community and commiters!

And count of closed Issues !

from awesome-dotnet-core.

It is possible to include automatic script that will gather links and update file on github ?

from awesome-dotnet-core.

@Diaskhan @ngohungphuc @LordMike I thought about it last year, and look around some of the other awesome projects, but actually, they added stars and forks manually. I think that does not make sense to do that way. If there is anything way to do that with CI then it would be great.

from awesome-dotnet-core.

@thangchung github CI is not for free! Possible must payed for CI!

from awesome-dotnet-core.

Actually i could write tool to parse and make starz? @thangchung in future u could by yourself code in c#?
Need more information about we just provide stars information ? Need to ptovide date of last commit ?

By the way the travis ci is free for opensource projects https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/languages/

from awesome-dotnet-core.

This is example for travic ci and C#
https://github.com/nbarbettini/csharp-travis-example

from awesome-dotnet-core.

@Diaskhan Yes, agreed that we can code for this type of functionality, but then we need to let the CI commit changes to GitHub again. It might make more cumbersome for awesome-dotnetcode project back then.

from awesome-dotnet-core.

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/28749727/xunit-add-info-to-output
Output of xunit!

from awesome-dotnet-core.

Commit data to travis https://www.vinaygopinath.me/blog/tech/commit-to-master-branch-on-github-using-travis-ci/

from awesome-dotnet-core.

We dont gonna be touch main source file !
We gonna create new file with stars and last cimmit information !

from awesome-dotnet-core.

Close it now. Because we don't work on it.

from awesome-dotnet-core.