Roadmap for a 3.0 about prompts HOT 5 OPEN

This would be great! It would help if you also have the publish rights to npm 😄

What do you think about fixing some low hanging fruits before releasing v3?
Adding the types (#396) and some other small bugs about not correctly handling combinations of keys seems to be simple enough to fix and localized enough (in the source code) not to have too much of an impact. Personally, I would also like to see some like this fixed 👀. The package doesn't seem to have tests for the different actions at the moment though

from prompts.

+1 for Support Testing 🙏

from prompts.

Meanwhile I'm over here looking for something that isn't an esm module since it's causing too much friction currently unfortunately, so this is what I landed on and I'm happy for that. Hopefully in the near future this is no longer the case though.

Upon my first usage of this utilizing a confirmation prompt, it would be great to have better typing, like if it could expose the name as a key, or remove that in general and standardize it, as well as then in that scenario it should be expected that it returns a boolean type.

from prompts.

…other packages (e.g. chalk) …

I would also like to see kleur replaced with chalk as a dependency, which has a nicer syntax.

from prompts.

@danielbayley from experience (see prisma/prisma#18900) I prefer kleur as it's smaller.

from prompts.