How should we schedule the "JS classes 1.1" proposal? about agendas HOT 6 CLOSED

cc @zenparsing @allenwb @bterlson

from agendas.

I think it would make sense to have in earlier in the week so attendee have a chance to think and talk about it over the course of the meeting. I would also give it 1 hour, but let the chair judge whether there is a productive discussion that should be allowed to spill over a bit.

The actual time is going to have to be based on @BrendanEich 's schedule, as he will be presenting. From a purely personal sleep loose minimization perspective, I'd prefer late afternoon London time. I believe that next week we are still in the window where the US west coast is -7 hours relative to London.

from agendas.

from agendas.

I would also give it 1 hour, but let the chair judge whether there is a productive discussion that should be allowed to spill over a bit.

So far, we have gotten strong pushback from committee members such as @ljharb for having the chairs decide things like this; that is why I'm asking the committee. I suppose we can ask the committee again at the time.

from agendas.

This topic is both cross cutting and core to our mission. I recommend we start early and expect to spend lots of time on it --- much more than one hour. I'm sure we will anyway.

from agendas.

OK, for now, I moved the JS classes 1.1 discussion above my own 1-hour items. I'm wonder if we should ask the committee at the beginning of the meeting something like whether it'd be OK to give a half-hour introduction on the first day, just to begin discussing it, including in breaks, and then we can continue discussing it during the later hour-long timebox.

@BrendanEich , what is your schedule looking like?

from agendas.