The annotations does not correspond to paper about deepfashion2 HOT 6 OPEN

We use bounding boxes/areas, which is the second one in your measurements, and the result is consistent with the first measurement, which uses the pre-made scale label.

from deepfashion2.

According to what I have seen in the dataset, these labels are to large extent wrong and it would be really awesome if you would consider re-assigning them. Examples of wrong bounding boxes can be seen in the following images:




The dashed lines are the ones from annotation files. The thick ones represent bounding boxes inferred from the segmentations.

from deepfashion2.

Could you please provide names of the above four images?

from deepfashion2.

There are many more similar to these, I could not find all of the previously mentioned ones but these are the ones I have found:

• 089587.jpg
  

• 080658.jpg
  

• 005696.jpg
  

• 008506.jpg
  

Moreover some of the segmentations are either missing or the items are split without a reason according to my visual assessment, e.g.:

• 49276.jpg
  

• 088005.jpg
  

Thank for your response and collaboration!

from deepfashion2.

Bounding boxes referred from segmentation label are accurate enough. You can use them instead.
A part of masks are annotated coarsely while the others are obtained through refinement.

from deepfashion2.

How we can we refer bounding boxes from segmentation label exactly.I am facing similar issue of wrong bounding box annotations

from deepfashion2.