Both Classification and Localization Performance is higher in my experiment than your eccv18 paper in Thumos14 about wtalc-pytorch HOT 4 CLOSED

Note that the classification performance you obtain when using Thumos14reduced is on the reduced dataset (200 data points for 20 categories). Whereas the numbers mentioned in paper is for the entire dataset, which is Thumos14. It is true that the localization performance obtained using this code is a bit higher than reported in the paper, and we obtained this after some code cleaning.

from wtalc-pytorch.

Hi sujoyp,

Thanks for your answer. I have another question if I may ask. Is there any reason you write the evaluation code on your own rather than using the official one simply? Have you tested on the official thumos14 matlab code? How is the performance? I am quite curious about it and too lazy to check it on my own. Thanks again!

from wtalc-pytorch.

We did try the official evaluation repo (which is in Matlab) and found the same results as our python implementation.

from wtalc-pytorch.

Hi @sujoyp, I see! Thanks for it!

from wtalc-pytorch.