Automatically accept all darknet predictions? about darkmark HOT 4 CLOSED

Thanks. Unfortunately not in DarkMark, I don't have an option for that.

Next easiest thing I can think of is to use DarkHelp Server with the option to create the .txt files for each image. Then you let it process your thousands of images. DarkMark will then automatically import those .txt files. Not straightforward, but may be worthwhile if you have so many images.

If you want to try, DarkHelp Server is documented here: https://www.ccoderun.ca/darkhelp/api/Server.html Note you already have it installed since DarkMark uses DarkHelp. But you would have to configure it to run the way you need.

from darkmark.

If you do try, the option you want is the one called darkhelp/server/settings/save_txt_annotations.

from darkmark.

Thanks, I will look into that. I tried the pseudo-labeling CLI for darknet, and I got unexpected results. Both
./darknet detector test ..... -thresh 0.25 -dont_show -save_labels > results.txt and
./darknet detector test ..... -thresh 0.25 -dont_show -ext_output < train.txt > results.txt

both result in many entries like this:

/home/ben/VisionProjects/Palletsv3/darkmark_image_cache/zoom/00001739.jpg: Predicted in 11.293000 milli-seconds. Person: 99% Person: 99% Person: 99% Enter Image Path: Detection layer: 139 - type = 28 Detection layer: 150 - type = 28 Detection layer: 161 - type = 28

Upon further inspection, it looks like it also wrote *.txt files next to the unmarked images, and refreshing and rescanning in DarkMark was able to find the new marks.

from darkmark.

The problem with using Darknet is I believe that it will generate some annotations with negative coordinates or widths/heights that extend beyond the edges of the image. May want to have a browse through the .txt files to see.

However, I think DarkMark fixes those up when it imports them. That was so long ago I don't recall anymore, you'll have to test it and see.

from darkmark.