Gemini opinion:

I can help you choose the right tool for your web frontend automation testing with Selenium, Cypress, Playwright, and TestCafe, considering your project's specifics (TypeScript, ReactJS, visual testing).

Here's a breakdown of the key differences and their suitability for your scenario:

Selenium:

• Pros:
  • Most mature and widely adopted framework.
  • Supports the broadest range of browsers and programming languages (including TypeScript).
  • Offers great flexibility for complex testing scenarios.
• Cons:
  • Can be more complex to set up and maintain compared to newer options.
  • Relies on external WebDriver implementations, adding another layer of configuration.
  • Might be overkill for purely visual testing.

Cypress:

• Pros:
  • Designed specifically for end-to-end (E2E) testing in the browser.
  • Offers a user-friendly, JavaScript-based API that integrates well with ReactJS projects.
  • Provides built-in visual testing capabilities.
  • Integrates well with GitHub Actions.
• Cons:
  • Supports a slightly smaller range of browsers compared to Selenium.
  • May not be ideal for highly complex testing requirements.

Playwright:

• Pros:
  • Developed by Microsoft, offering good support and frequent updates.
  • Supports multiple programming languages (including TypeScript) and browsers.
  • Provides a powerful and flexible API for various testing needs, including visual testing.
  • Integrates well with GitHub Actions.
• Cons:
  • Still relatively new compared to Selenium, with a smaller community.
  • Might have a steeper learning curve for those unfamiliar with its approach.

TestCafe:

• Pros:
  • Easy to set up and use, with a focus on developer experience.
  • Offers good visual testing capabilities.
  • Integrates well with continuous integration tools like GitHub Actions.
• Cons:
  • Supports a limited set of browsers compared to the others.
  • Might not be as flexible for highly customized testing needs.

Considering your project:

• Frontend-only with TypeScript and ReactJS: Cypress or Playwright would be strong contenders due to their native JavaScript support and potential integration with React testing libraries.
• Visual testing focus: Cypress and TestCafe both have built-in visual testing features.
• GitHub Actions integration: All these tools integrate well with GitHub Actions.

Recommendation:

For your ReactJS frontend with a focus on visual testing and GitHub Actions integration, Cypress appears to be the most suitable choice. Its built-in visual testing capabilities and smooth integration with React development tools make it a great fit.

However, if you need more flexibility and broader browser support, Playwright is another strong option worth considering. It offers a powerful API and is actively maintained.

Additional tips:

• Experiment with both Cypress and Playwright to see which one feels more comfortable for you and your team.
• Explore the documentation and community resources for each tool to get a better understanding of their capabilities.

I hope this comprehensive analysis helps you make an informed decision!

from cyphergui.

Implementing playwright

While in development I don't commit and push screenshots. So before pull request don't forget to regenerate and commit them.

from cyphergui.

Looks like the tests will be separated into multiple groups.

• Neo4j with movies dataset - test all elementary read only functionality - run in parallel
• Neo4j empty - test write operations - execute in series
• Neo4j enterprise - multidatabase
• Memgraph - test memgraph specific functions (map as node/rel property, not all property types like in Neo4j, what else? Check where you call db.ecosystem)

from cyphergui.

Don't forget to add informations to CONTRIBUTING.md

from cyphergui.

While in development I don't commit and push screenshots. So before pull request don't forget to regenerate and commit them.

Considering to not use screenshot visual check.

from cyphergui.