Comments (5)
publicarray
commented on August 15, 2024
1
using -parallelism=1 works as a work around.
from terraform-provider-vultr.
squat
commented on August 15, 2024
Thanks a lot for reporting this! Can you share an example .tf file you used to reproduce this error? I'd like to test it. We should also eventually have an integration test that tests for this rate limit error.
from terraform-provider-vultr.
squat
commented on August 15, 2024
Closing thanks to #17
from terraform-provider-vultr.
publicarray
commented on August 15, 2024
Hi, I just received the same error
* vultr_firewall_rule.ntp: vultr_firewall_rule.ntp: Error getting firewall rule (c639d718/6): Rate limit reached - please try your request again later. Current rate limit: 2 requests/sec
I've installed via go so I'm current with the master branch
Example:
resource "vultr_firewall_group" "rancher_dns_server" {
description = "rancher-dns-server"
}resource "vultr_firewall_rule" "ssh" {
firewall_group_id = "${vultr_firewall_group.rancher_dns_server.id}"
cidr_block = "0.0.0.0/0"
protocol = "tcp"
from_port = 22
to_port = 22
}resource "vultr_firewall_rule" "docker" {
firewall_group_id = "${vultr_firewall_group.rancher_dns_server.id}"
cidr_block = "0.0.0.0/0"
protocol = "tcp"
from_port = 2376
to_port = 2376
}resource "vultr_firewall_rule" "dot" {
firewall_group_id = "${vultr_firewall_group.rancher_dns_server.id}"
cidr_block = "0.0.0.0/0"
protocol = "tcp"
from_port = 853
to_port = 853
}resource "vultr_firewall_rule" "dot_ipv6" {
firewall_group_id = "${vultr_firewall_group.rancher_dns_server.id}"
cidr_block = "::/0"
protocol = "tcp"
from_port = 853
to_port = 853
}resource "vultr_firewall_rule" "dnscrypt_tcp" {
firewall_group_id = "${vultr_firewall_group.rancher_dns_server.id}"
cidr_block = "0.0.0.0/0"
protocol = "tcp"
from_port = 8443
to_port = 8443
}resource "vultr_firewall_rule" "dnscrypt_tcp_ipv6" {
firewall_group_id = "${vultr_firewall_group.rancher_dns_server.id}"
cidr_block = "::/0"
protocol = "tcp"
from_port = 8443
to_port = 8443
}resource "vultr_firewall_rule" "dnscrypt_udp" {
firewall_group_id = "${vultr_firewall_group.rancher_dns_server.id}"
cidr_block = "0.0.0.0/0"
protocol = "udp"
from_port = 8443
to_port = 8443
}resource "vultr_firewall_rule" "dnscrypt_udp_ipv6" {
firewall_group_id = "${vultr_firewall_group.rancher_dns_server.id}"
cidr_block = "::/0"
protocol = "udp"
from_port = 8443
to_port = 8443
}resource "vultr_firewall_rule" "doh" {
firewall_group_id = "${vultr_firewall_group.rancher_dns_server.id}"
cidr_block = "0.0.0.0/0"
protocol = "tcp"
from_port = 443
to_port = 443
}resource "vultr_firewall_rule" "doh_ipv6" {
firewall_group_id = "${vultr_firewall_group.rancher_dns_server.id}"
cidr_block = "::/0"
protocol = "tcp"
from_port = 443
to_port = 443
}resource "vultr_firewall_rule" "ntp" {
firewall_group_id = "${vultr_firewall_group.rancher_dns_server.id}"
cidr_block = "0.0.0.0/0"
protocol = "udp"
from_port = 123
to_port = 123
}resource "vultr_firewall_rule" "ntp_ipv6" {
firewall_group_id = "${vultr_firewall_group.rancher_dns_server.id}"
cidr_block = "::/0"
protocol = "udp"
from_port = 123
to_port = 123
}resource "vultr_firewall_rule" "munin" {
firewall_group_id = "${vultr_firewall_group.rancher_dns_server.id}"
cidr_block = "0.0.0.0/0"
protocol = "tcp"
from_port = 4949
to_port = 4949
}
from terraform-provider-vultr.
gibsonje
commented on August 15, 2024
I'm also hitting this on firewall rules. It was after I refactored to use a for_each loop. I was wondering if that made it behave worse as far as hitting the api too fast.
@publicarray 's suggestion of parallelism=1 worked for me as a workaround.
from terraform-provider-vultr.
Related Issues (20)
- Mismatched Cidr Notation HOT 2
- [Feature request] Documentation improvement HOT 6
- Enabling Autobackups HOT 2
- Recommendations for working with Vultr API Rate Limiting HOT 3
- “Provider doesn’t support data source” for resource vultr_startup_script HOT 2
- Sensible Defaults HOT 1
- Backup Options HOT 1
- Feature request - parameterise email notification on server creation HOT 1
- Destroy step shows failed status but actually deletes the server HOT 16
- Support adding/removing private networks without recreating the instance HOT 3
- Expose MACs of private networks in instance resource HOT 3
- Automatic PTR records, reverse DNS
- Add support for plan changes
- dockerfile Created
- Incompatible API version with plugin. Plugin version: 4, Client versions: [5] HOT 4
- Add firewall_rule notes
- internalizing fatih's structs HOT 2
- Publish release with tf 0.12 support HOT 1
- Support Object Storage
- mac sierra install error
Recommend Projects
-
React
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
-
Vue.js
🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
-
Typescript
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
-
TensorFlow
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
-
Django
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
-
Laravel
A PHP framework for web artisans
-
D3
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉
-
Recommend Topics
-
javascript
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
-
web
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
-
server
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
-
Machine learning
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
-
Visualization
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
-
Game
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
Recommend Org
-
Facebook
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
-
Microsoft
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
-
Google
Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.
-
Alibaba
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
-
D3
Data-Driven Documents codes.
-
Tencent
China tencent open source team.
from terraform-provider-vultr.