MIMARKS_Data_combined.csv not created/downloaded about f1000_workflow HOT 6 CLOSED

You're right, this is unclear, the data is in the repository: https://github.com/spholmes/F1000_workflow/tree/master/data

from f1000_workflow.

We should probably automate the download like we did for the other data.

from f1000_workflow.

Especially given the slight difficulty of downloading a single GitHub file. Finally managed it in terminal as:

wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/spholmes/F1000_workflow/master/data/MIMARKS_Data_combined.csv

after changing to the desired directory.
Thanks
Dan

from f1000_workflow.

I'm not understanding the issue. The expectation is that you would download/clone the whole repository, in which case all the files, including in data/, would be available locally, in the (portable) relative path of the scripts you're running.

The entire workflow is completely reproducible as a repository, as-is.

@spholmes am I missing something?

from f1000_workflow.

Ah this is a good point.

Maybe you should write that in the README.md to make it clearer. I came across this from the manuscript.

There is no obvious mention of GitHub repository on there and no mention of the desire to clone it. I came by the GitHub repository after I had already started the tutorial analysis.

from f1000_workflow.

Thanks for clarifying. You may not the only person to miss this.

However, there is a Data Availability section toward the end of the manuscript:

Data availability

Intermediary data for the analyses are made available both on GitHub at https://github.com/spholmes/F1000_workflow
and at the Stanford digital repository permanent url for this paper: http://purl.stanford.edu/wh250nn9648.
All other data have been previously published and the links are included in the paper.

Software availability
Bioconductor packages at
https://www.bioconductor.org/.
CRAN packages at
https://cran.r-project.org/.

Permanent repository for the data and program source of this paper:

https://purl.stanford.edu/wh250nn9648

Latest source code as at the time of publication:

https://github.com/spholmes/F1000_workflow

Archived source as at the time of publication:
Zenodo: F1000_workflow: MicrobiomeWorkflowv0.9, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.5454436

Given that this is in the manuscript, I think I will close this issue.

from f1000_workflow.