Custom Elements about site_prism HOT 5 CLOSED

Hm, I suppose Section does the job of wrapping a complex element. Is this the recommended path?

from site_prism.

so the idea behind SitePrism is you declare portions of your page inside a Section

your portion could be incredibly tiny, so in pseudo code you could have

section = DatePicker
elements = each date number
elements = only odd numbers
elements = every sunday
element = currently highlighted date
elements = invalid dates (greyed out)

if you attach an SSCCE with something that isn't possible at the moment then let me know. Or raise a PR if that's easier? I'm convinced you should be fine though

from site_prism.

Yea sections is the way to go. The name “Section” just threw me off. Maybe “Component” might be better? Anyways consider this resolved.

from site_prism.

Any thoughts on renaming "Section" to "Component"?

from site_prism.

so Section is named because according to the POM definition that is what is used across the board.

There is some reading you can do here: https://martinfowler.com/bliki/PageObject.html (Java theory but good tutor)
A recent medium post here: https://medium.com/tech-tajawal/page-object-model-pom-design-pattern-f9588630800b

It won't be renamed as it is correct as is. Also renaming it would lead to a heap of confusion and would be a backwards facing rear end change. It is very self-descriptive and seems to be the generic use case across the board.

Can I ask where the issue is coming from?

from site_prism.