Which license to use? about ci-docker-images HOT 5 OPEN

I think since the images themselves are hosted by Github Package Registry, maybe the license problems don't apply to us?

In that case Apache 2.0 would suffice, which by coincidence is also used by the simdjson library and the official docker repository!

from ci-docker-images.

Surely, we are not the first project to look at packaging their own images for CI purposes. Have you encountered other sizeable projects that do so? How do they handle the licensing of their custom images?

from ci-docker-images.

Unfortunately, I have not yet come across such a project.

from ci-docker-images.

We'll have to find someone who can provide advice then. I do not know.

from ci-docker-images.

I think that publishing the docker scripts is fine for sure (I do so all the time), but the images are something else. They carry binary code and so forth.

from ci-docker-images.