MMX/SSE related functions about simde HOT 5 OPEN

Many of the rest are already implemented in SIMDe. I updated the table to add the intrinsic names next to the CPU instruction mnemonic.

from simde.

Can you add the intrinsic/function name for the rest of the instructions? I'm seeing more of then as already implemented in SIMDe

How do you check?

1. Go to https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/docs/intrinsics-guide/index.html#
2. Search for the instruction name: https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/docs/intrinsics-guide/index.html#text=MASKMOVQ
3. If there are multiple hits, check them for a matching Instruction: line: https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/docs/intrinsics-guide/index.html#text=MASKMOVQ&ig_expand=4253 → _mm_maskmove_si64
4. Check SIMDe source for the intrinsic:

   simde/simde/x86/sse.h

   Lines 2922 to 2942 in 517da84

   	SIMDE_FUNCTION_ATTRIBUTES
   	void
   	simde_mm_maskmove_si64 (simde__m64 a, simde__m64 mask, int8_t* mem_addr) {
   	#if defined(SIMDE_X86_SSE_NATIVE) && defined(SIMDE_X86_MMX_NATIVE)
   	_mm_maskmove_si64(a, mask, HEDLEY_REINTERPRET_CAST(char*, mem_addr));
   	#else
   	simde__m64_private
   	a_ = simde__m64_to_private(a),
   	mask_ = simde__m64_to_private(mask);
   	SIMDE_VECTORIZE
   	for (size_t i = 0 ; i < (sizeof(a_.i8) / sizeof(a_.i8[0])) ; i++)
   	if (mask_.i8[i] < 0)
   	mem_addr[i] = a_.i8[i];
   	#endif
   	}
   	#define simde_m_maskmovq(a, mask, mem_addr) simde_mm_maskmove_si64(a, mask, mem_addr)
   	#if defined(SIMDE_X86_SSE_ENABLE_NATIVE_ALIASES)
   	# define _mm_maskmove_si64(a, mask, mem_addr) simde_mm_maskmove_si64((a), (mask), SIMDE_CHECKED_REINTERPRET_CAST(int8_t*, char*, (mem_addr)))
   	# define _m_maskmovq(a, mask, mem_addr) simde_mm_maskmove_si64((a), (mask), SIMDE_CHECKED_REINTERPRET_CAST(int8_t*, char*, (mem_addr)))
   	#endif

Thanks!

from simde.

Done - remaining instructions I don't find in Intel intrinsics list.

Most are implemented, only 14 "related" ones aren't.

from simde.

@Torinde Can you add the intrinsic/function name for the rest of the instructions? I'm seeing more of then as already implemented in SIMDe

Thanks for flagging these, we need to represent this status information better in our docs

from simde.

Can you add the intrinsic/function name for the rest of the instructions? I'm seeing more of then as already implemented in SIMDe

How do you check?

from simde.