Giter Club home page Giter Club logo

Comments (12)

szeiger avatar szeiger commented on June 9, 2024

Hm, the last release was 0.11-RC1. Should we rerelease that as 0.11 and make this one 0.12-M1?

from junit-interface.

benmccann avatar benmccann commented on June 9, 2024

You could. Or make this one 0.11 or 0.11-RC2. Whatever's easiest

from junit-interface.

copumpkin avatar copumpkin commented on June 9, 2024

Yes please! I'm itching for test duration reporting, too 😺

from junit-interface.

benmccann avatar benmccann commented on June 9, 2024

@copumpkin you can get test duration reporting without a new release. you use sbt 0.13.5 and it will create junit xml report files with the test durations

from junit-interface.

copumpkin avatar copumpkin commented on June 9, 2024

Oh, I meant in the common sbt-wide test-interface that junit-interface supports. I have some hooks in my sbt build that pulls the durations from there but in junit-interface 0.10, the durations are bogus (they don't override the default behavior which returns 0 or -1). That's what I meant, sorry!

from junit-interface.

benmccann avatar benmccann commented on June 9, 2024

Oh yeah, I would definitely recommend 0.11-RC1 over 0.10. It's been out forever and is stable

from junit-interface.

copumpkin avatar copumpkin commented on June 9, 2024

Whee, that got me what I wanted, thanks! Is something holding up 0.11 proper though, or is it just that it doesn't feel like there's much benefit over RC1?

from junit-interface.

benmccann avatar benmccann commented on June 9, 2024

No reason not to release the current code as 0.11 in my eyes.

from junit-interface.

jroper avatar jroper commented on June 9, 2024

@szeiger depends on the versioning strategy - we've moved to a strategy in Play where we avoid RC's for minor releases in Play unless there's something that we're really not confident of. We've found that RC's add a lot of inertia to the release process, with not a lot of advantage gained. They result in longer minor release cycles, meaning it takes longer for users to get fixes. If there's a bug/regression, the RC phase often doesn't pick them up anyway, so we think it's quicker to just keep moving forward with many small releases.

I'd say that junit-interface should do the same, given there is no team actively maintaining it, that "no team" can't afford the inertia introduced by RCs, it will just frustrate users. So my vote is to release master as 0.11.

from junit-interface.

benmccann avatar benmccann commented on June 9, 2024

+1 my experience completely matches this though @jroper put it to words much better than I would have

from junit-interface.

szeiger avatar szeiger commented on June 9, 2024

@jroper, @benmccann good point. Released as 0.11.

from junit-interface.

benmccann avatar benmccann commented on June 9, 2024

Woohoo!!! Thank you sooo much!

from junit-interface.

Related Issues (20)

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.