[BUG] salt v3007.1 onedir rpm package dependencies break the system about salt HOT 8 OPEN

This problem also effects v3006.8 ...

No idea how something as fundamental as this got past QA ???

from salt.

Looks like similar issue happens when running bootstrap script on Ubuntu 24 fails as well with:

Hit:1 http://eu-central-1.ec2.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble InRelease
Hit:2 http://eu-central-1.ec2.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble-updates InRelease
Hit:3 http://eu-central-1.ec2.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble-backports InRelease
Hit:4 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble-security InRelease
Ign:5 https://repo.saltproject.io/salt/py3/ubuntu/24.04/amd64/minor/3007.1 trusty InRelease
Err:6 https://repo.saltproject.io/salt/py3/ubuntu/24.04/amd64/minor/3007.1 trusty Release
  404  Not Found [IP: 143.204.98.62 443]
Reading package lists...
 * ERROR: Failed to run install_ubuntu_onedir_deps()!!!

Also as Im new to Salt, I have to add that I ran ./bootstrap-salt.sh -M -P stable 3007.1, I saw "onedir" release option but used "stable" not sure if this is related, but leaving this here as extra info.

from salt.

Looks like similar issue happens when running bootstrap script on Ubuntu 24 fails as well with:

It is not the same, the bootstrap script doesn't support Ubuntu 24 yet. There is an open pull request to implement that: saltstack/salt-bootstrap#2001

from salt.

Looks like similar issue happens when running bootstrap script on Ubuntu 24 fails as well with:

It is not the same, the bootstrap script doesn't support Ubuntu 24 yet. There is an open pull request to implement that: saltstack/salt-bootstrap#2001

Ah ok, thank you, just starting out using Salt and this bootstrap script ⚡

from salt.

@dwoz pretty sure the spec change in #66403 is what broke it.

from salt.

We are seeing this as well in 3006.8 when we were staging it for an upgrade.

from salt.

@dwoz pretty sure the spec change in #66403 is what broke it.

Seems legit. Though not entirely sure why since all those shared objects should be under lib/

from salt.

The update in #66403 changes the regexs from ^.*\\.so.*$ to ^lib/.*\\.so.*$ - shouldn't that be to ^lib.*\\.so.*$ ?

i.e. is it matching filenames of the type libxyz.so.N ?

Or if matching files in a lib/ sub directory, then shouldn't it be to ^.*/lib/.*\\.so.*$ (or ^.*/lib/lib.*\\.so.*$) ?

from salt.