License missing from gemspec about mailgunner HOT 6 CLOSED

+1

from mailgunner.

@bergerjac lazy me says its an easy PR

from mailgunner.

@bf4 Not a particularly complex PR I agree, but you'd have to know what license to pick, and I haven't decided yet (considering dual licensing with GPLv3 as an alternative to MIT).

Automated pull requests and +1s aren't that helpful. I'd appreciate any input from anyone that uses the gem in a commercial production application (ditto for Vonage/vonage-ruby-sdk#14).

from mailgunner.

If you want to prevent people from making changes to your work without providing them back to you → GPL

If you want people to use your name when they use your work in something → MIT or BSD

If you don't care at all → WTFPL

extracted from ...which license to use

this gem is so small (a good thing) that I think most changes people make would be submitted for PRs, or forked and kept in their own public repo

from mailgunner.

Most gems are MIT. I'd say to just pick that unless you have a reason not to.

from mailgunner.

Closed via 85ceaf6 Awesome, thanks 🌈

from mailgunner.