parameter buffer is NULL for MYSQL_TYPE_STRING parameters! about sqlpp11-connector-mysql HOT 23 CLOSED

You can verify this by debugging the Sqlpp11MySQLSelectTest Visual C++ project

from sqlpp11-connector-mysql.

See line 61 of SelectTest.cpp, function void testSelectAll(sql::connection& db, int expectedRowCount)

from sqlpp11-connector-mysql.

It may be that you have designed around this and it is not a true bug when calling to MySQL through the connector... but I thought I called it to your attention because if that is not it then I think it could bring corruption at some point -- that is, if that buffer should have non-zero length as suggested by the assert in MySQL source code.

Best regards,
Juan

from sqlpp11-connector-mysql.

I believe I found a solution. Take a look at bind_result.cpp. line 115. Just add a vector to the buffer...

    void bind_result_t::_bind_text_result(size_t index, const char** value, size_t* len)
    {
      if (_handle->debug)
        std::cerr << "MySQL debug: binding text result at index: " << index << std::endl;

      detail::result_meta_data_t& meta_data = _handle->result_param_meta_data[index];
      meta_data.index = index;
      meta_data.len = len;
      meta_data.is_null = nullptr;
      meta_data.text_buffer = value;
// ADD NEXT LINE:
      meta_data.bound_text_buffer = std::vector<char>(254);
      MYSQL_BIND& param = _handle->result_params[index];
      param.buffer_type = MYSQL_TYPE_STRING;
      param.buffer = meta_data.bound_text_buffer.data();
      param.buffer_length = meta_data.bound_text_buffer.size();
      param.length = &meta_data.bound_len;
      param.is_null = &meta_data.bound_is_null;
      param.is_unsigned = false;
      param.error = &meta_data.bound_error;
    }

Best regards,
Juan

from sqlpp11-connector-mysql.

Hi Juan,

I am confused by this. Did you actually run into a problem or do you suspect that there might be a problem one day? If you ran into a problem, please show me a minimally complete example.

As far as I understand the mysql documentation, the code is doing the right thing:

http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.7/en/mysql-stmt-fetch.html

They even write:

Invoke mysql_stmt_fetch() with a zero-length buffer for the column in question and a pointer in which the real length can be stored. Then use the real length with mysql_stmt_fetch_column().

Best,

Roland

from sqlpp11-connector-mysql.

Please look at bind_result_t::next_impl(), too.

from sqlpp11-connector-mysql.

Hi roland

Ok. I did run into a problem when running against a debug build of MySQL
There is an assert checking whether the buffer length is larger than zero. The check is only made in the debug build of MySQL
You will not see this if you build against a release MySQL which is the usual way
However the assert is present in the source code which makes me think MySQL needs a non zero length buffer at that point
As to the documentation there is a contradiction between it and the actual source code of MySQL

If you download the source code of MySQL I can point you to the exact file, function and line where this assert exists and you can judge for yourself as to if this is an error

My thinking is that since you normally use release builds this issue has gone undetected

Regards
Juan

Sent from my iPhone

On May 16, 2016, at 2:44 AM, Roland Bock [email protected] wrote:

Hi Juan,

I am confused by this. Did you actually run into a problem or do you suspect that there might be a problem one day? If you ran into a problem, please show me a minimally complete example.

As far as I understand the mysql documentation, the code is doing the right thing:

http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.7/en/mysql-stmt-fetch.html

They even write:

Invoke mysql_stmt_fetch() with a zero-length buffer for the column in question and a pointer in which the real length can be stored. Then use the real length with mysql_stmt_fetch_column().

Best,

Roland

—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub

from sqlpp11-connector-mysql.

Hi Juan,

Thanks for the clarification. The library should work with a debug version of MySQL, too.

On the other hand, I do not like to allocate memory needlessly. So I need to think about this a bit.

Best,

Roland

from sqlpp11-connector-mysql.

Hi Roland,

Here is part of the MySQL code:

static my_bool setup_one_fetch_function(MYSQL_BIND *param, MYSQL_FIELD *field)
{
  DBUG_ENTER("setup_one_fetch_function");
//.....
  case MYSQL_TYPE_VAR_STRING:
  case MYSQL_TYPE_STRING:
  case MYSQL_TYPE_DECIMAL:
  case MYSQL_TYPE_NEWDECIMAL:
  case MYSQL_TYPE_NEWDATE:
  case MYSQL_TYPE_JSON:
    DBUG_ASSERT(param->buffer_length != 0);
    param->fetch_result= fetch_result_str;
    break;

this assert is the one complaining about empty buffer, it exists in line 4078 of function setup_one_fetch_function in file libmysql.c of the MySQL source code.

Please let me know if this is more clear

Regards!
Juan

from sqlpp11-connector-mysql.

Hi Roland

If the documentation is correct then the assert is incorrect but in that case a release build should run fine since the assert is only evaluated in debug build of MySQL

If that's the case then I need to build a release build of MySQL and that's the end of it

However since documentation often diverges from implementation I would trust the assert to be right and the documentation to be outdated

Regards
Juan

Sent from my iPhone

On May 16, 2016, at 7:44 AM, Roland Bock [email protected] wrote:

Hi Juan,

Thanks for the clarification. The library should work with a debug version of MySQL, too.

On the other hand, I do not like to allocate memory needlessly. So I need to think about this a bit.

Best,

Roland

—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub

from sqlpp11-connector-mysql.

from sqlpp11-connector-mysql.

The MySQL documentation talks about mysql_stmt_fetch not about mysql_stmt_bind_result

Invoke mysql_stmt_fetch() with a zero-length buffer for the column in question and a pointer in which the real length can be stored. Then use the real length with mysql_stmt_fetch_column()

The assert occurs in setup_one_fetch_function which is called from mysql_stmt_bind_result

Best regards,
Juan

from sqlpp11-connector-mysql.

from sqlpp11-connector-mysql.

I apologize

Did not look at the sample code

Regards
Juan

Sent from my iPhone

On May 16, 2016, at 11:12 AM, Roland Bock [email protected] wrote:

Huh?

The example on that page starts with:

real_length= 0;
bind[0].buffer= 0;
bind[0].buffer_length= 0;
bind[0].length= &real_length
mysql_stmt_bind_result(stmt, bind);

So yes, it is about mysql_stmt_bind_result.

But as I wrote earlier, of course I want the code to work with the debug
version as well. If that requires non-zero length, then I need to find a
solution for that.

Best,

Roland
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub

from sqlpp11-connector-mysql.

Dear Juan,

Sorry for taking so long. I finally got to this. Please check if the latest commit on develop does the trick (you will need to update sqlpp11, too).

In contrast to the solution you proposed, I am using resize if the bound_text_buffer is empty. This should result in fewer allocations.

Best,

Roland

from sqlpp11-connector-mysql.

Hi Roland!

I just tested the develop branch and found the problem is indeed corrected. Yet, there is an important define that isn't being defined in the sqlpp-mysql project: NOMINMAX. This is required to avoid conflicts with Microsoft's macros for min and max.

One question: why is resize(8) better than just assigning a new vector? What underlying implementation are you relying on...

Best regards and thanks for getting this right!

Juan Dent

from sqlpp11-connector-mysql.

Hi Juan,

Thanks for the feedback!

About the vector: I guess I wrote a bit hastily. The conditional resize would result in less allocations if bind were called more than once per result. I don't think this is currently the case. However, if this should change for whatever reason, then resize is the better option.

About the NOMINMAX: I introduced that in the one place, where it bit me. I am not sure where to put it in general?

Best,

Roland

from sqlpp11-connector-mysql.

Hi Roland,

Concerning NOMINMAX, I only have to define it in the sqlpp-mysql project so maybe that's the place to go.

One question if you don't mind: given the quality of your sqlpp library, what do you use for GUI interface? I mean, GUI libraries like Qt are so old-fashioned when it comes to using modern C++ that it's discouraging... Maybe you have something better - or is proprietary...

Best regards,
Juan

from sqlpp11-connector-mysql.

Hi Juan,

OK, so you mean you (and MSVC users in general) can take care of the NOMINMAX without changes in the library?

As for the GUI, I'll answer in the chat, since I guess that topic might be interesting for more people.

Best,

Roland

from sqlpp11-connector-mysql.

so you mean you (and MSVC users in general) can take care of the NOMINMAX without changes in the library?

YES, a simple #define in the preprocessor part of the sqlpp-mysql Visual Studio project

Glad to be of help!

Juan

On Sep 8, 2016, at 11:03 PM, Roland Bock [email protected] wrote:

Hi Juan,

OK, so you mean you (and MSVC users in general) can take care of the NOMINMAX without changes in the library?

As for the GUI, I'll answer in the chat, since I guess that topic might be interesting for more people.

Best,

Roland

—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub #20 (comment), or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFHnFZQm0Yy0CBy6-xiMI1nhE1pYq1Bcks5qoOiPgaJpZM4Ie-B3.

from sqlpp11-connector-mysql.

Hi Roland,

Where in Github.com will you refer to the GUI issue? This is SO important to me - and as you say, for many others!!

Best regards,
Juan

On Sep 8, 2016, at 11:03 PM, Roland Bock [email protected] wrote:

Hi Juan,

OK, so you mean you (and MSVC users in general) can take care of the NOMINMAX without changes in the library?

As for the GUI, I'll answer in the chat, since I guess that topic might be interesting for more people.

Best,

Roland

—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub #20 (comment), or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFHnFZQm0Yy0CBy6-xiMI1nhE1pYq1Bcks5qoOiPgaJpZM4Ie-B3.

from sqlpp11-connector-mysql.

Hi Juan,

I answered in the gitter chat: https://gitter.im/sqlpp11/Lobby

Best,

Roland

from sqlpp11-connector-mysql.

This is released now

from sqlpp11-connector-mysql.