Contradictory description in the doc of Shubbery Notation about rhombus-prototype HOT 3 CLOSED

Closing this because I found it is unhelpful and probably bikeshedding, which is not needed during this early stage of the project.

from rhombus-prototype.

I don't think there's anything incorrect.

1 + 2
  + 1 + 2

// parsed as '(top (group 1 (op +) 2 (op +) 1 (op +) 2))

has only one group. The operator at the beginning of the second line indicates a continuation of the group.

In contrast, this has two different groups:

1 + 2
1 + 2

// parsed as '(top (group 1 (op +) 2) (group 1 (op +) 2))

And indeed, if we indent correctly, it errors:

1 + 2
  1 + 2

// wrong indentation (or missing `:` on previous line)

from rhombus-prototype.

And indeed, if we indent correctly, it errors:

1 + 2
  1 + 2

// wrong indentation (or missing `:` on previous line)

Oh I see. My mind must have been absent when filing the issue....

from rhombus-prototype.