Giter Club home page Giter Club logo

Comments (2)

LorenzMeier avatar LorenzMeier commented on July 26, 2024

I think there is some big confusion where the origins of MAVLink are and which ecosystem is driving the development of the protocol. Our group at ETH introduced MAVLink in 2009 and is using it as main interface. It really makes no sense for us to not base the flow interface on it.

There must be some huge misconception on your end about the protocol and its origins (I suggest to check out http://github.com/mavlink and http://qgroundcontrol.org/mavlink/start for the official docs) and we will generally not let the research and engineering process being guided by political considerations (other than staying an independent open source project).

Note that we will not accept pull requests suggesting the removal of the protocol and that the codebase is currently undergoing major improvements (100% performance increase since last week) - so anyone trying to maintain a fork will miss out on substantial improvements regularly.

Closing this.

from px4-flow.

MAVProxyUser avatar MAVProxyUser commented on July 26, 2024

I think you over read between the seemingly implied lines. If you read the forums plenty of folks want to interface with simple microControllers. Not everyone wants to use MAVlink.

My request is more alone the lines if can you add an option to communicate over the UART sans MAVlink.

If anything it would require some IFDEFs... I had to remove the functionality as I'm not able to follow along in the very lagged ArduCopter development on this sensor.

The main intent is to enable folks that don't want to be tied to MAVlink when is it flat out is not necessary to speak to this sensor package.

Your political pontificating is off base unfortunately. I didn't send you a pull request because It isn't appropriate. The link was more of an example to show it is not required.

I'm happily reading from both the sonar and gyro. The flow camera seems to be non functioning for what ever reason.

Given there is no test libraries to easily verify all sensors are spitting out sane data, I am unable to verify it works at all for the time being.

from px4-flow.

Related Issues (20)

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.