Profiling about i2pd HOT 10 CLOSED

Ok, got any plan on how? Latency check? Connection time?

from i2pd.

Tunnels participation initially. If tunnel was alive for 10 minutes, than participatiing routers are good. Count it.
And vice-versa
But it must a generic framework

from i2pd.

Gotcha. Cloud you expand the explaination of what you mean with a "generic framework" in this context? Anyway, do you got a plan on how we're going to inject this code? I'm guessing this will be own classes/objects that current tunnel code and such report back to, or get read by. Or do you have a better idea in mind?

from i2pd.

Look at the class TunnelPool where it if tunnel pair is good by sending DeliveryStatus messsage. Then it should be separate class like RouterProfile, every router refers to. And these profiles must be in separate data structure sorted by it's "score". Plus it must be presistent.

from i2pd.

Ok got it. I think this is something I can look on and you don't have to worry about it. I'll complete the SSLClient for reseed now, then I will try to expand my knowledge by doing Issue #86 , and continue with this. Then you can focus on more deep details I've yet to understand. I'll ask in doubt and when I got questions. Sounds Ok?

from i2pd.

Do whatever you wish.
About SSL I would look at boost::asio first, because it definitly supports SSL

from i2pd.

Don't worry, doing it. Already done most, sneak peak:
https://gist.github.com/mikalv/9f0ac8f7cda445b83079

(feel free to comment if you see somethings I've done wrong or should be done better or whatever.)

from i2pd.

profile stats and score. What do you think of sqlite3 as bakend, another format, or do you prefer own binary structures?

from i2pd.

use STL, like std::set
This is not a task for database. Think like C++ developer rather than web.
For persistance use simple key=value format

from i2pd.

Issues moved to https://track.privacysolutions.no

from i2pd.