Rename source files for executables (examples) to nfc-*.c about libnfc HOT 5 CLOSED

Why don't you re-design the entire source tree instead?

- src

-- core

--- links
---- usb
---- uart
---- i2c
---- spi

--- chips
---- pn531
---- pn532
---- pn533

--- devices
---- arygon
---- ...

--- libnfc.h
--- libnfc.c

-- tools
--- nfc-list
--- nfc-anticol
--- ...

Roel, I'm agree with your point of view: we must get a better overview.

Zuck, we can't redesign like you describe due to actual structure of libnfc: for
example we haven't both abstractions: chips and devices. BTW, we could restruct 
a bit
like that:

+-+ src
  |
  +- libnfc.c
  +- libnfc.h
  |
  +-+ nfc
  | +- bitutils.h/c
  | +- defines.h
  | +- types.h
  | +- ...
  |
  +-+ devices
  | +- pn531_usb.h/c
  | +- pn533_usb.h/c
  | +- pn532_uart.h/c
  | +- arygon_uart.h/c
  |
  +-+ examples
    +- nfc-mftool
    +- nfc-mfultool
    +- nfc-list
    +- nfc-anticol
    +- ...

What do you think about Roel ? Zuck ? other contributor/developer ?

I like that structure Romuald, "pn531_usb.h/c" and "pn533_usb.h/c" could become
"pn53x_usb.h/c" (just the same for the uart), but hey, that is a other issue we 
are
going to solve soon ;)

One thing though, is "nfc" maybe a to vague topic to put all those files under?
Maybe "general" or "core" or "support", or just "various"

Well, anyway, I think it looks nice and clean the proposed way!

Renaming task have been done in r140 and examples sources have been put in
src/examples subdirectory.