Integration of @set entry type in Biblist? about biber HOT 8 CLOSED

This should be fixed in biber 2.20 DEV. It was to do with biblist filtering and sets - basically no set members of any sets in a list should be filtered out if the set itself is included.

from biber.

This is a bug in biber with set handling in biblists - currently being looked at, thank you for reporting.

from biber.

I just noticed that the MWE gives me

with Biber 2.20 dev.

In particular the @set entry does not get a shorthand. Not sure what the general expectation here is, but naively I certainly expected that a @set could have a shorthand.

from biber.

Yes, I woud like to get C. P. G. as shorthand for the @set.

from biber.

Amazingly, this hasn't ever been possible as shorthand was never written to the .bbl for sets apart from a legacy (mistaken) fallback where a set would inherit the shorthand from the first set member ... now this should be fixed in 2.20 DEV.

from biber.

Works great now!

@Doc73 You may want to check the publisher in Latte1961: It's probably Olms and not Holms.

from biber.

@moewew
Just these days I'm reviewing all my bibliography and I didn't notice this mistake.
I do not know how to thank you! 😄

from biber.

2.20 is now released

from biber.